Pankaj Prabhu Kumar Gupta vs Gaurav Mahajan And National Ins. Co. Ltd. Advocate - Hamdani A. A. — 1217/2022

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 164injury. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT on 22nd April 2026.

Case disposed

MACP - Motor Accident Claim Petition

CNR: MHMT010017332022

Filing Number

1697/2022

Filing Date

30-Aug-2022

Registration No

1217/2022

Registration Date

22-Sep-2022

Court

MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI

Judge

5-H. H. Member

Decision Date

22-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT

Last updated 21-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act Section 164injury

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Pankaj Prabhu Kumar Gupta

    Adv. Shingte R. R.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Gaurav Mahajan And National Ins. Co. Ltd. Advocate - Hamdani A. A.

  2. 2.National Insurance Co. Ltd.

    Adv. Nair P. B.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 22-Apr-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Summary The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Mumbai awarded Rs. 2,50,000 compensation to a 19-year-old claimant who suffered grievous injuries including Achilles tendon rupture with 34% permanent disability in a motor accident. The tribunal held that under Section 164 of the Motor Vehicles Act (no-fault liability), the car owner and insurer are jointly and severally liable regardless of the motorcycle rider's alleged traffic violations, as the fault defense is unavailable in such claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 22-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    H. H. Member

  4. 21-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    H. H. Member

  5. 17-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    H. H. Member

  6. 15-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    H. H. Member

  7. 02-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    H. H. Member

  8. 30-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    H. H. Member

  9. 24-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    H. H. Member

  10. 18-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    H. H. Member

  11. 11-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    H. H. Member

  12. 04-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    H. H. Member

  13. 27-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    H. H. Member

  14. 13-Feb-2026

    Defence Evidence

    H. H. Member

  15. 23-Jan-2026

    Defence Evidence

    H. H. Member

  16. 16-Jan-2026

    Defence Evidence

    H. H. Member

  17. 07-Jan-2026

    Defence Evidence

    H. H. Member

  18. 19-Dec-2025

    Defence Evidence

    H. H. Member

  19. 05-Dec-2025

    Defence Evidence

    H. H. Member

  20. 21-Nov-2025

    Defence Evidence

    H. H. Member

  21. 14-Nov-2025

    Defence Evidence

    H. H. Member

  22. 31-Oct-2025

    Defence Evidence

    H. H. Member

  23. 26-Sep-2025

    Defence Evidence

    H. H. Member

  24. 19-Sep-2025

    Defence Evidence

    H. H. Member

  25. 29-Aug-2025

    Defence Evidence

    H. H. Member

  26. 01-Aug-2025

    Defence Evidence

    H. H. Member

  27. 11-Jul-2025

    Defence Evidence

    H. H. Member

  28. 27-Jun-2025

    Part Heard

    H. H. Member

  29. 16-Jun-2025

    Recording Of Evidence

    H. H. Member

  30. 02-Apr-2025

    Recording Of Evidence

    H. H. Member

  31. 28-Feb-2025

    Recording Of Evidence

    H. H. Member

  32. 22-Jan-2025

    Recording Of Evidence

    H. H. Member

  33. 10-Dec-2024

    Recording Of Evidence

    H. H. Member

  34. 23-Oct-2024

    Recording Of Evidence

    H. H. Member

  35. 20-Sep-2024

    Recording Of Evidence

    H. H. Member

  36. 12-Jul-2024

    For Issues

    H. H. Member

  37. 10-Jun-2024

    Written Statement

    H. H. Member

  38. 26-Mar-2024

    Written Statement

    H. H. Member

  39. 09-Feb-2024

    Written Statement

    H. H. Member

  40. 05-Jan-2024

    Written Statement

    H. H. Member

  41. 24-Nov-2023

    Written Statement

    H. H. Member

  42. 13-Oct-2023

    Written Statement

    H. H. Member

  43. 15-Sep-2023

    Written Statement

    H. H. Member

  44. 11-Aug-2023

    Reply

    H. H. Member

  45. 21-Jul-2023

    Reply

    H. H. Member

  46. 16-Jun-2023

    Reply

    H. H. Member

  47. 03-May-2023

    Reply

    H. H. Member

  48. 31-Mar-2023

    Reply

    H. H. Member

  49. 14-Feb-2023

    Documents

    H. H. Member

  50. 09-Jan-2023

    Documents

    H. H. Member

  51. 15-Dec-2022

    Documents

    H. H. Member

  52. 03-Oct-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  53. 30-Aug-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1217/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Mumbai awarded Rs. 2,50,000 compensation to a 19-year-old claimant who suffered grievous injuries including Achilles tendon rupture with 34% permanent disability in a motor accident. The tribunal held that under Section 164 of the Motor Vehicles Act (no-fault liability), the car owner and insurer are jointly and severally liable regardless of the motorcycle rider's alleged traffic violations, as the fault defense is unavailable in such claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case