Ganesh Arjun Shinde vs Kala Surendra Nair and SBI Gen. Ins. Co. Ltd. — 160/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 21. Disposed: Contested--DECREE SATISFIED on 12th March 2026.
MACP. DKST.
CNR: MHMT010013932024
Filing Number
1103/2024
Filing Date
24-04-2024
Registration No
160/2024
Registration Date
12-06-2024
Court
MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI
Judge
3-H. H. Member
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DECREE SATISFIED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ganesh Arjun Shinde
Adv. S. B. Ingle and Associate
Respondent(s)
Kala Surendra Nair and SBI Gen. Ins. Co. Ltd.
SBI Gen. Ins. Co. Ltd.
Hearing History
Judge: 3-H. H. Member
Disposed
STEPS UNREADY
STEPS UNREADY
STAYED BY HONBLE HIGH COURT
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 19-02-2026 | STEPS UNREADY |
| 13-11-2025 | STEPS UNREADY |
| 28-08-2025 | STAYED BY HONBLE HIGH COURT |
| 17-07-2025 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Case 160/2024 The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal at Mumbai partially granted Ganesh Arjun Shinde's execution application against the insurer SBI General Insurance Co. Ltd. for a Rs. 1,66,749/- motor accident compensation award. While the tribunal found the execution validly instituted and service properly proved, it suspended coercive proceedings due to a High Court stay order granted during the insurer's pending appeal, but permitted the claimant to withdraw 50% of the deposited amount with accrued interest, with the balance remaining invested pending appeal outcome. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Case 160/2024 The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal at Mumbai partially granted Ganesh Arjun Shinde's execution application against the insurer SBI General Insurance Co. Ltd. for a Rs. 1,66,749/- motor accident compensation award. While the tribunal found the execution validly instituted and service properly proved, it suspended coercive proceedings due to a High Court stay order granted during the insurer's pending appeal, but permitted the claimant to withdraw 50% of the deposited amount with accrued interest, with the balance remaining invested pending appeal outcome. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts