Suvidha Subhash Solanki vs Krishna Murti Pillai — 141/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 21. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OTHERWISE on 12th March 2026.

MACP. DKST.

CNR: MHMT010013572025

Case disposed

Filing Number

1040/2025

Filing Date

15-04-2025

Registration No

141/2025

Registration Date

12-06-2025

Court

MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI

Judge

3-H. H. Member

Decision Date

12th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OTHERWISE

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 21

Petitioner(s)

Suvidha Subhash Solanki

Adv. Salunke J. S.

Respondent(s)

Krishna Murti Pillai

Yad Hussain Sirajuddin

Shriram Gen. Ins. Co. Ltd.

New India Assu. Co. Ltd.

Hearing History

Judge: 3-H. H. Member

12-03-2026

Disposed

21-02-2026

STAYED BY HONBLE HIGH COURT

18-12-2025

STAYED BY HONBLE HIGH COURT

27-11-2025

SAY HEARING ON EXH.____READY

04-11-2025

SAY HEARING ON EXH.____READY

Final Orders / Judgements

12-03-2026
Order on Exh.

Case Summary: Solanki v. Pillai & Others (Execution Application 141/2025) The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal disposed of the execution application after the High Court granted a stay order and the defendant insurer deposited the full decretal amount of Rs. 7,15,819. The Tribunal held that continued coercive execution (attachment/warrant process) was unwarranted once the stay was in place and payment made, though it reserved liberty for parties to seek further relief pending the appellate proceedings' final outcome. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Solanki v. Pillai & Others (Execution Application 141/2025) The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal disposed of the execution application after the High Court granted a stay order and the defendant insurer deposited the full decretal amount of Rs. 7,15,819. The Tribunal held that continued coercive execution (attachment/warrant process) was unwarranted once the stay was in place and payment made, though it reserved liberty for parties to seek further relief pending the appellate proceedings' final outcome. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case