Dhananjay Maruti Pawar vs Kala Surendra Nair and SBI Gen. Ins. Co. Ltd. — 137/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 21. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OTHERWISE on 11th March 2026.
MACP. DKST.
CNR: MHMT010011922024
Filing Number
1066/2024
Filing Date
22-04-2024
Registration No
137/2024
Registration Date
06-05-2024
Court
MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI
Judge
3-H. H. Member
Decision Date
11th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISPOSED OTHERWISE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Dhananjay Maruti Pawar
Adv. S. B. Ingle and Associate
Respondent(s)
Kala Surendra Nair and SBI Gen. Ins. Co. Ltd.
SBI Gen. Ins. Co. Ltd.
Hearing History
Judge: 3-H. H. Member
Disposed
STEPS UNREADY
STEPS UNREADY
STAYED BY HONBLE HIGH COURT
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 19-02-2026 | STEPS UNREADY |
| 13-11-2025 | STEPS UNREADY |
| 28-08-2025 | STAYED BY HONBLE HIGH COURT |
| 17-07-2025 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal at Mumbai disposed of an execution application seeking recovery of Rs. 21,06,129/- awarded in a motor accident claim, after finding that a High Court stay order was operating on the matter and the decree holder had not taken effective prosecuting steps for an extended period. The tribunal held that while execution proceedings should not stagnate, they cannot proceed in violation of a superior court's stay order, and therefore disposed of the application with liberty to the decree holder to revive or file fresh proceedings once the High Court stay is vacated or clarified. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal at Mumbai disposed of an execution application seeking recovery of Rs. 21,06,129/- awarded in a motor accident claim, after finding that a High Court stay order was operating on the matter and the decree holder had not taken effective prosecuting steps for an extended period. The tribunal held that while execution proceedings should not stagnate, they cannot proceed in violation of a superior court's stay order, and therefore disposed of the application with liberty to the decree holder to revive or file fresh proceedings once the High Court stay is vacated or clarified. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts