Smt Hsinabano Munna Shaikh vs Salim Ibrahim Shaikh and Go Digit Gen Ins Co Ltd Advocate - Thanawala H. C. — 426/2022

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 166,140injury. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 22nd April 2026 Date Not Updated.

Arguments Next hearing 22-Apr-2026

MACP - Motor Accident Claim Petition

CNR: MHMT010006652022

Filing Number

699/2022

Filing Date

30-Mar-2022

Registration No

426/2022

Registration Date

01-Jun-2022

Court

MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI

Judge

1-H. H. Chairman

Last updated 21-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act Section 166,140injury

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Smt Hsinabano Munna Shaikh

    Adv. Ganesan S. M.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Salim Ibrahim Shaikh and Go Digit Gen Ins Co Ltd Advocate - Thanawala H. C.

  2. 2.Go Digit Gen. Ins. Co. Ltd.

Case History

  1. 22-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    H. H. Chairman

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Defence Evidence

    H. H. Chairman

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Part Heard

    H. H. Chairman

  5. 25-Feb-2026

    Part Heard

    H. H. Chairman

  6. 12-Feb-2026

    Order on Exh.View PDF

    Summary: The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (MACT), Mumbai rejected the Insurer's application for deletion from the claim proceedings. The Insurer contended that the insurance policy (No.D02617544/321025645) produced by the claimant was fake and fabricated, with multiple discrepancies. However, the court held that since the Insurer raised this defence in its Written Statement, it must be proved through evidence and cross-examination during the trial, not at the preliminary stage. Therefore, the application was rejected and the Insurer remains a party to the proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  7. 12-Feb-2026

    Part Heard

    H. H. Chairman

  8. 31-Jan-2026

    Order On Exh._____unready

    H. H. Chairman

  9. 14-Jan-2026

    Order On Exh._____unready

    H. H. Chairman

  10. 07-Jan-2026

    Say Hearing On Exh.____ready

    H. H. Chairman

  11. 28-Nov-2025

    Part Heard

    H. H. Chairman

  12. 12-Nov-2025

    Part Heard

    H. H. Chairman

  13. 08-Oct-2025

    Part Heard

    H. H. Chairman

  14. 10-Sep-2025

    Part Heard

    H. H. Chairman

  15. 13-Aug-2025

    Part Heard

    H. H. Chairman

  16. 25-Jun-2025

    Recording Of Evidence

    H. H. Chairman

  17. 27-Mar-2025

    List Of Witness

    H. H. Chairman

  18. 10-Jan-2025

    Order on Exh.View PDF

  19. 10-Jan-2025

    For Issues

    H. H. Chairman

  20. 08-Jan-2025

    140 Hearing On Nfl Appln

    H. H. Chairman

  21. 11-Dec-2024

    140 Hearing On Nfl Appln

    H. H. Chairman

  22. 20-Nov-2024

    140 Hearing On Nfl Appln

    H. H. Chairman

  23. 09-Oct-2024

    140 Hearing On Nfl Appln

    H. H. Chairman

  24. 25-Sep-2024

    140 Hearing On Nfl Appln

    H. H. Chairman

  25. 03-Jul-2024

    Documents

    H. H. Chairman

  26. 24-Apr-2024

    Documents

    H. H. Chairman

  27. 06-Mar-2024

    Documents

    H. H. Chairman

  28. 17-Jan-2024

    Documents

    H. H. Chairman

  29. 22-Nov-2023

    Documents

    H. H. Chairman

  30. 20-Sep-2023

    Documents

    H. H. Chairman

  31. 26-Jul-2023

    Documents

    H. H. Chairman

  32. 21-Jun-2023

    Documents

    H. H. Chairman

  33. 12-Apr-2023

    Documents

    H. H. Chairman

  34. 15-Feb-2023

    Documents

    H. H. Chairman

  35. 04-Jan-2023

    Documents

    H. H. Chairman

  36. 30-Nov-2022

    Documents

    H. H. Chairman

  37. 12-Oct-2022

    Documents

    H. H. Chairman

  38. 12-Sep-2022

    Documents

    H. H. Chairman

  39. 30-Jul-2022

    For Appearance of Parties/ Advocates

    H. H. Chairman

  40. 06-Jun-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  41. 30-Mar-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 426/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (MACT), Mumbai rejected the Insurer's application for deletion from the claim proceedings. The Insurer contended that the insurance policy (No.D02617544/321025645) produced by the claimant was fake and fabricated, with multiple discrepancies. However, the court held that since the Insurer raised this defence in its Written Statement, it must be proved through evidence and cross-examination during the trial, not at the preliminary stage. Therefore, the application was rejected and the Insurer remains a party to the proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case