Swati Sudesh Kadam and Other 1 vs Vinod Vasudeo Vanjare and Orienta Ins Co Ltd — 167/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 141. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 18th April 2026.

Case disposed

MACP. M.A.

CNR: MHMT010004662026

Filing Number

594/2026

Filing Date

23-Feb-2026

Registration No

167/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI

Judge

3-H. H. Member

Decision Date

18-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

Last updated 29-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 141

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Swati Sudesh Kadam and Other 1

    Adv. Parab S. M.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Vinod Vasudeo Vanjare and Orienta Ins Co Ltd

  2. 2.Oriental Ins. Co. Ltd.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Apr-2026

    Order on Exh.View PDF

    Case Summary Case 167/2026 – Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Mumbai The tribunal partly allowed the application for withdrawal and disbursement of compensation awarded in the underlying motor accident claim. It released 50% of the Rs. 7,66,200 award (plus accrued interest) to applicant No.1 (widow) via NEFT/RTGS after the insurer's High Court appeal was dismissed. However, the remaining 50% share of applicant No.2 (minor) must continue to remain invested in a nationalized bank FD until he attains majority, protecting the minor's interest per settled precedent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    H. H. Member

  4. 16-Apr-2026

    Order On Exh._____ready

    H. H. Member

  5. 02-Apr-2026

    Report

    H. H. Member

  6. 23-Mar-2026

    Report

    H. H. Member

  7. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 23-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 167/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Case 167/2026 – Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Mumbai The tribunal partly allowed the application for withdrawal and disbursement of compensation awarded in the underlying motor accident claim. It released 50% of the Rs. 7,66,200 award (plus accrued interest) to applicant No.1 (widow) via NEFT/RTGS after the insurer's High Court appeal was dismissed. However, the remaining 50% share of applicant No.2 (minor) must continue to remain invested in a nationalized bank FD until he attains majority, protecting the minor's interest per settled precedent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case