Shankar B. Jha vs Deepakkumar S. Mishra and Arjun Pancham Singh Advocate - Pawar R. B. — 539/2019

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 166,140Injury. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT on 20th April 2026.

Case disposed

MACP - Motor Accident Claim Petition

CNR: MHMT010004262019

Filing Number

408/2019

Filing Date

14-Feb-2019

Registration No

539/2019

Registration Date

07-Mar-2019

Court

MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI

Judge

3-H. H. Member

Decision Date

20-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT

Last updated 21-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act Section 166,140Injury

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Shankar B. Jha

    Adv. Patil Sachin R.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Deepakkumar S. Mishra and Arjun Pancham Singh Advocate - Pawar R. B.

  2. 2.Arjun Pancham Singh

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 20-Apr-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Mumbai dismissed the applicant's compensation claim under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act. While the court confirmed that the applicant sustained vehicular accident injuries on 22.07.2018, it found that he failed to prove the motorcycle's driver acted negligently—the applicant neither testified nor produced eyewitnesses, and no charge-sheet against the driver was proved. Consequently, without establishing negligence and lacking proof of damages, no compensation was awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    H. H. Member

  4. 16-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    H. H. Member

  5. 09-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    H. H. Member

  6. 11-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    H. H. Member

  7. 16-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    H. H. Member

  8. 07-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    H. H. Member

  9. 17-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    H. H. Member

  10. 01-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    H. H. Member

  11. 27-Nov-2025

    Hearing

    H. H. Member

  12. 28-Oct-2025

    Return Of Notice

    H. H. Member

  13. 03-Oct-2025

    Recording Of Evidence

    H. H. Member

  14. 15-Sep-2025

    Recording Of Evidence

    H. H. Member

  15. 29-Jul-2025

    Recording Of Evidence

    H. H. Member

  16. 15-Jul-2025

    Recording Of Evidence

    H. H. Member

  17. 25-Jun-2025

    Recording Of Evidence

    H. H. Member

  18. 13-Jun-2025

    Recording Of Evidence

    H. H. Member

  19. 25-Mar-2025

    Recording Of Evidence

    H. H. Member

  20. 24-Feb-2025

    Recording Of Evidence

    H. H. Member

  21. 20-Jan-2025

    Recording Of Evidence

    H. H. Member

  22. 12-Nov-2024

    Recording Of Evidence

    H. H. Member

  23. 09-Sep-2024

    Recording Of Evidence

    H. H. Member

  24. 06-Aug-2024

    Recording Of Evidence

    H. H. Member

  25. 30-Jul-2024

    Recording Of Evidence

    H. H. Member

  26. 13-Jun-2024

    Recording Of Evidence

    H. H. Member

  27. 12-Mar-2024

    Recording Of Evidence

    H. H. Member

  28. 11-Jan-2024

    Recording Of Evidence

    H. H. Member

  29. 04-Dec-2023

    Recording Of Evidence

    H. H. Member

  30. 20-Nov-2023

    Recording Of Evidence

    H. H. Member

  31. 14-Sep-2023

    Recording Of Evidence

    H. H. Member

  32. 20-Jul-2023

    Recording Of Evidence

    H. H. Member

  33. 24-Apr-2023

    Recording Of Evidence

    H. H. Member

  34. 12-Jan-2023

    Recording Of Evidence

    H. H. Member

  35. 13-Oct-2022

    Recording Of Evidence

    H. H. Member

  36. 23-Aug-2022

    Recording Of Evidence

    H. H. Member

  37. 28-Jul-2022

    Recording Of Evidence

    H. H. Member

  38. 28-Apr-2022

    Documents

    H. H. Member

  39. 07-Mar-2022

    Documents

    H. H. Member

  40. 10-Feb-2022

    Documents

    H. H. Member

  41. 20-Dec-2021

    Documents

    H. H. Member

  42. 26-Oct-2021

    Documents

    H. H. Member

  43. 30-Aug-2021

    Documents

    H. H. Member

  44. 07-Aug-2021

    Documents

    H. H. Member

  45. 15-Jul-2021

    Documents

    H. H. Member

  46. 14-Jun-2021

    Documents

    H. H. Member

  47. 05-Apr-2021

    Documents

    H. H. Member

  48. 12-Feb-2021

    Documents

    H. H. Member

  49. 16-Jan-2021

    Documents

    H. H. Member

  50. 08-Dec-2020

    Documents

    H. H. Member

  51. 12-Nov-2020

    Documents

    H. H. Member

  52. 06-Oct-2020

    Documents

    H. H. Member

  53. 11-Sep-2020

    Documents

    H. H. Member

  54. 18-Aug-2020

    Documents

    H. H. Member

  55. 22-Jul-2020

    Documents

    H. H. Member

  56. 04-May-2020

    Documents

    H. H. Member

  57. 20-Mar-2020

    Documents

    H. H. Member

  58. 14-Jan-2020

    Documents

    H. H. Member

  59. 26-Nov-2019

    Documents

    H. H. Member

  60. 07-Oct-2019

    Documents

    H. H. Member

  61. 29-Aug-2019

    Notice Unready

    H. H. Member

  62. 05-Aug-2019

    Notice Unready

    H. H. Member

  63. 27-Jun-2019

    Notice Unready

    H. H. Member

  64. 12-Apr-2019

    Notice Unready

    H. H. Member

  65. 14-Mar-2019

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  66. 14-Feb-2019

    Case filed

    Registration No. 539/2019

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Mumbai dismissed the applicant's compensation claim under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act. While the court confirmed that the applicant sustained vehicular accident injuries on 22.07.2018, it found that he failed to prove the motorcycle's driver acted negligently—the applicant neither testified nor produced eyewitnesses, and no charge-sheet against the driver was proved. Consequently, without establishing negligence and lacking proof of damages, no compensation was awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case