Dharmendra Ray vs Raunak Samir Ganatra And Tata AIG. GEn.Ins.Co.LTD. Advocate - Golande S. D. — 1351/2024
Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 166,Injury. Status: AMEND PLAINT. Next hearing: 23rd April 2026 Date Not Updated.
MACP - Motor Accident Claim Petition
CNR: MHMT010002462024
Next Hearing
23rd April 2026 Date Not Updated
Filing Number
263/2024
Filing Date
29-01-2024
Registration No
1351/2024
Registration Date
07-08-2024
Court
MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI
Judge
3-H. H. Member
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Dharmendra Ray
Adv. Mehta U. N.
Respondent(s)
Raunak Samir Ganatra And Tata AIG. GEn.Ins.Co.LTD. Advocate - Golande S. D.
TATA AIG General Insurance Co. Ltd.
Samir Kishor Ganatra
Hearing History
Judge: 3-H. H. Member
AMEND PLAINT
AMEND PLAINT
AMEND PLAINT
AMEND PLAINT
AMEND PLAINT
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | AMEND PLAINT |
| 05-02-2026 | AMEND PLAINT |
| 08-12-2025 | AMEND PLAINT |
| 29-11-2025 | AMEND PLAINT |
| 04-11-2025 | AMEND PLAINT |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary MACT Mumbai, Motor Accident Claims Case No. 1351 of 2024 The Tribunal allowed the application (Exh.14) and directed the claimant to implead Mr. Samir Kishore Ganatra, the registered owner and insured of the offending vehicle (MH-02-DJ-7110), as Respondent No.3 within 7 days. The court found that both the registered owner and insurer are necessary parties for effective adjudication under Sections 166-168 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, and that the omission was curable. Notice shall be issued to the newly added party upon amendment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary MACT Mumbai, Motor Accident Claims Case No. 1351 of 2024 The Tribunal allowed the application (Exh.14) and directed the claimant to implead Mr. Samir Kishore Ganatra, the registered owner and insured of the offending vehicle (MH-02-DJ-7110), as Respondent No.3 within 7 days. The court found that both the registered owner and insurer are necessary parties for effective adjudication under Sections 166-168 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, and that the omission was curable. Notice shall be issued to the newly added party upon amendment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts