Navghar Police Station vs Jayram Jetha Gami — 752/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 420,506,34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 10th July 2025.
Police Case PW
CNR: MHMM230039942024
e-Filing Number
12-12-2024
Filing Number
3994/2024
Filing Date
12-Dec-2024
Registration No
752/2024
Registration Date
12-Dec-2024
Court
Metropolitan Magistrate, Mulund, Mumbai
Judge
1-Judicial Magistrate First Class 27th Court
Decision Date
10-Jul-2025
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Last updated 02-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
25
Police Station
Navghar
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Navghar Police Station
Adv. Ld. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Jayram Jetha Gami
-
2.Govind Jetha Gami
-
3.Keshav Damji Minat
-
4.Premji Velji Patel
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Jul-2025
Copy of Judgment.View PDF
Summary The court acquitted all four accused persons under IPC Sections 420, 506, and 34, finding that the prosecution failed to establish a credible case against them regarding fraudulent construction-related transaction. The primary witness (Accused No. 1 as prosecution witness) contradicted the prosecution's narrative, creating reasonable doubt about the charges; consequently, the accused were discharged and entitled to acquittal under CrPC Section 248(1). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Jul-2025
Disposed
Judicial Magistrate First Class 27th Court
-
07-Jul-2025
For Judgment
Judicial Magistrate First Class 27th Court
-
12-Dec-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Dec-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 752/2024
Summary The court acquitted all four accused persons under IPC Sections 420, 506, and 34, finding that the prosecution failed to establish a credible case against them regarding fraudulent construction-related transaction. The primary witness (Accused No. 1 as prosecution witness) contradicted the prosecution's narrative, creating reasonable doubt about the charges; consequently, the accused were discharged and entitled to acquittal under CrPC Section 248(1). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts