Rajnish Madanlal Gajbhiye vs Secretary, Gram Panchayat, Pachagaon and Anr Advocate - Shri. Ravisamrat V. Sontakke. — 22/2025
Case under Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act Section 28. Status: Issues. Next hearing: 22nd April 2026.
Complaint ULP
CNR: MHLC360002022025
Next Hearing
22nd April 2026
Filing Number
205/2025
Filing Date
14-11-2025
Registration No
22/2025
Registration Date
14-11-2025
Court
Labour Court, Bhandara
Judge
1-JUDGE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Rajnish Madanlal Gajbhiye
Adv. S. R. Dongre
Respondent(s)
Secretary, Gram Panchayat, Pachagaon and Anr Advocate - Shri. Ravisamrat V. Sontakke.
Sarpanch, Grampanchayat, Pachagaon
Sarpanch, Grampanchayat, Pachagaon
Adv. Shri. Ravisamrat V. Sontakke.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-JUDGE
Issues
Issues
Issues
Issues
Further Hearing
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 24-03-2026 | Issues |
| 06-03-2026 | Issues |
| 17-02-2026 | Issues |
| 02-02-2026 | Issues |
| 27-01-2026 | Further Hearing |
Interim Orders
Summary: The Labour Court, Bhandara granted interim relief to complainant Rajnish Madanlal Gajbhiye in his unfair labour practice complaint against the Gram Panchayat. The court found a prima facie case in the complainant's favor, noting he was appointed as peon on 01/02/2024 with a clean service record, and that the respondents' advertisement for the same post on 01/10/2025 created reasonable apprehension of termination. The court restrained the respondents from terminating his services or appointing another person to the peon post until final disposal of the complaint, and directed continuation of his employment on existing terms and conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Labour Court, Bhandara granted interim relief to complainant Rajnish Madanlal Gajbhiye in his unfair labour practice complaint against the Gram Panchayat. The court found a prima facie case in the complainant's favor, noting he was appointed as peon on 01/02/2024 with a clean service record, and that the respondents' advertisement for the same post on 01/10/2025 created reasonable apprehension of termination. The court restrained the respondents from terminating his services or appointing another person to the peon post until final disposal of the complaint, and directed continuation of his employment on existing terms and conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts