Prashant Suryabhan Madame vs C.E.O. Z. P. Bhandara and 01. Advocate - Ravibhushan Bhusari — 22/2023
Case under Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act Section 28,30. Status: Further Evidence. Next hearing: 27th March 2026.
Complaint ULP
CNR: MHLC360001482023
Next Hearing
27th March 2026
Filing Number
152/2023
Filing Date
08-11-2023
Registration No
22/2023
Registration Date
08-11-2023
Court
Labour Court, Bhandara
Judge
1-JUDGE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Prashant Suryabhan Madame
Adv. Vinay Ashok Bhoyar
Respondent(s)
C.E.O. Z. P. Bhandara and 01. Advocate - Ravibhushan Bhusari
Deputy Chief Ex. Officer, Z.P. Bhandara.
Adv. Ravibhushan Bhusari
Hearing History
Judge: 1-JUDGE
Further Evidence
Further Evidence
Cross Examination
Cross Examination
Cross Examination
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Further Evidence |
| 06-03-2026 | Further Evidence |
| 20-02-2026 | Cross Examination |
| 06-02-2026 | Cross Examination |
| 23-01-2026 | Cross Examination |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Labour Court, Bhandara - Complaint (ULPA) No. 22 of 2023 Order Date: 12-01-2024 The application for interim relief filed by Prashant Madame, a Water Quality Expert, seeking reinstatement pending final disposal of his unfair labour practice complaint has been rejected. The court found no prima facie case, no balance of convenience, and no irreparable loss in favour of the complainant, noting that his contract-based appointment contained explicit conditions permitting automatic termination after 11 months and that his conduct in issuing a suicide letter was objectionable under the appointment conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Labour Court, Bhandara - Complaint (ULPA) No. 22 of 2023 Order Date: 12-01-2024 The application for interim relief filed by Prashant Madame, a Water Quality Expert, seeking reinstatement pending final disposal of his unfair labour practice complaint has been rejected. The court found no prima facie case, no balance of convenience, and no irreparable loss in favour of the complainant, noting that his contract-based appointment contained explicit conditions permitting automatic termination after 11 months and that his conduct in issuing a suicide letter was objectionable under the appointment conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts