Dhaneshwar Ganesh Uikey vs Shri N. Vasudevan, The M.D.,F.D.C.M. Mah St. Nagpur and 02 others. — 10/2023

Case under Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act Section 48. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED IN DEFAULT on 11th March 2026.

Crim.ULP - Crim Appln

CNR: MHLC360000422023

Case disposed

Filing Number

43/2023

Filing Date

09-03-2023

Registration No

10/2023

Registration Date

09-03-2023

Court

Labour Court, Bhandara

Judge

1-JUDGE

Decision Date

11th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED IN DEFAULT

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act Section 48

Petitioner(s)

Dhaneshwar Ganesh Uikey

Adv. Rhishikesh Anant Gupte

Respondent(s)

Shri N. Vasudevan, The M.D.,F.D.C.M. Mah St. Nagpur and 02 others.

Shri Rushikesh Rajan, The Regional Manager, FDCM, Nagpur.

Shri S. T. Gandhile, The Divisional Manager, FDCM, Bhandara

Hearing History

Judge: 1-JUDGE

11-03-2026

Disposed

06-03-2026

DISMISSAL ORDER

25-02-2026

DISMISSAL ORDER

15-01-2026

Verification

09-12-2025

Verification

Final Orders / Judgements

11-03-2026
Dismissed in Default

The Labour Court, Bhandara dismissed Criminal ULP No. 10/2023 filed by Dnyaneshwar Ganesh Uike against Shri N. Vasudevan and two others for want of prosecution. The court found that the complainant and his advocate were repeatedly absent during hearings and failed to take steps to proceed with the matter, demonstrating lack of interest despite being given due opportunity, making continued pendency purposeless. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Labour Court, Bhandara dismissed Criminal ULP No. 10/2023 filed by Dnyaneshwar Ganesh Uike against Shri N. Vasudevan and two others for want of prosecution. The court found that the complainant and his advocate were repeatedly absent during hearings and failed to take steps to proceed with the matter, demonstrating lack of interest despite being given due opportunity, making continued pendency purposeless. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Labour Court, Bhandara All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case