Prashant Devidas Pande vs D.T.O., M.S.R.T.C. Bhandara. Advocate - Prakash Nichkawade — 6/2019
Case under Animal Birth Control (Dogs) Rules - 2009 Section 28302. Status: Further Chief. Next hearing: 27th March 2026.
Complaint ULP
CNR: MHLC360000252019
Filing Number
52/2019
Filing Date
26-Feb-2019
Registration No
6/2019
Registration Date
26-Feb-2019
Court
Labour Court, Bhandara
Judge
1-Judge
Last updated 26-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Prashant Devidas Pande
Adv. Sachin Eknath Raghorte
Respondent(s)
-
1.D.T.O., M.S.R.T.C. Bhandara. Advocate - Prakash Nichkawade
Case History
-
27-Mar-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-Mar-2026
Further Chief
Judge
-
27-Feb-2026
Further Chief
Judge
-
13-Feb-2026
Further Chief
Judge
-
06-Feb-2026
Further Chief
Judge
-
31-Jan-2026
Further Chief
Judge
-
23-Jan-2026
Further Chief
Judge
-
09-Jan-2026
Further Chief
Judge
-
19-Dec-2025
Further Chief
Judge
-
01-Dec-2025
Further Chief
Judge
-
21-Nov-2025
Further Chief
Judge
-
14-Nov-2025
Further Chief
Judge
-
03-Oct-2025
Awaiting R and P
Judge
-
29-Aug-2025
Awaiting R and P
Judge
-
27-Jun-2025
Awaiting R and P
Judge
-
29-Apr-2025
Awaiting R and P
Judge
-
28-Feb-2025
Awaiting R and P
Judge
-
30-Jan-2025
Awaiting R and P
Judge
-
04-Jan-2025
Awaiting R and P
Judge
-
29-Nov-2024
Awaiting R and P
Judge
-
27-Sep-2024
Awaiting R and P
Judge
-
30-Aug-2024
Awaiting R and P
Judge
-
19-Jul-2024
Awaiting R and P
Judge
-
07-Jun-2024
Awaiting R and P
Judge
-
02-May-2024
Awaiting R and P
Judge
-
12-Apr-2024
Awaiting R and P
Judge
-
01-Mar-2024
Awaiting R and P
Judge
-
20-Jan-2024
Awaiting R and P
Judge
-
26-Dec-2023
Awaiting R and P
Judge
-
20-Nov-2023
Awaiting R and P
Judge
-
30-Sep-2023
Awaiting R and P
Judge
-
25-Aug-2023
Awaiting R and P
Judge
-
07-Jul-2023
Awaiting R and P
Judge
-
17-Jun-2023
Further Chief
Judge
-
02-Jun-2023
Further Chief
Judge
-
29-Apr-2023
Further Chief
Judge
-
15-Apr-2023
Further Chief
Judge
-
24-Mar-2023
Further Chief
Judge
-
24-Feb-2023
Further Chief
Judge
-
04-Feb-2023
Further Chief
Judge
-
21-Jan-2023
Respondent Evidence
Judge
-
07-Jan-2023
Respondent Evidence
Judge
-
23-Dec-2022
Respondent Evidence
Judge
-
03-Dec-2022
Respondent Evidence
Judge
-
11-Nov-2022
Respondent Evidence
Judge
-
12-Oct-2022
Judgment on P.P.View PDF
Case Summary Court: Labour Court, Bhandara Case: ULP 06/2019 (Judgment on Preliminary Issues) Date: 12/10/2022 The Labour Court declared that while the departmental enquiry against bus conductor Prashant Devidas Pande was conducted fairly and in accordance with principles of natural justice, the Enquiry Officer's findings declaring him guilty of consuming liquor on duty are perverse and unreliable. The court found the officer relied solely on a medical certificate noting alcohol smell on the complainant's breath, despite the same certificate confirming he showed no other signs of intoxication and explicitly stating he was not under influence of liquor; additionally, no chemical analysis report was produced and no FIR was filed against the complainant (unlike the driver). The case proceeds to hearing on remaining issues with the respondent Corporation directed to lead evidence to justify its dismissal action. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Oct-2022
Evidence
Judge
-
30-Sep-2022
Further Hearing
Judge
-
17-Sep-2022
Pre Issues Hearing
Judge
-
20-Aug-2022
Pre Issues Hearing
Judge
-
22-Jul-2022
Pre Issues Hearing
Judge
-
10-Jun-2022
Evidence
Judge
-
01-Apr-2022
Evidence
Judge
-
25-Mar-2022
Evidence
Judge
-
04-Mar-2022
Evidence
Judge
-
11-Feb-2022
Evidence
Judge
-
29-Jan-2022
Evidence
Judge
-
30-Dec-2021
Evidence
Judge
-
10-Dec-2021
Evidence
Judge
-
12-Nov-2021
Evidence
Judge
-
14-Oct-2021
Evidence
Judge
-
23-Sep-2021
Issues
Judge
-
27-Aug-2021
Issues
Judge
-
06-Aug-2021
Cost.
Judge
-
12-Jul-2021
Respondent Evidence
Judge
-
18-Jun-2021
Respondent Evidence
Judge
-
28-May-2021
Respondent Evidence
Judge
-
05-May-2021
Respondent Evidence
Judge
-
06-Apr-2021
Respondent Evidence
Judge
-
26-Mar-2021
Respondent Evidence
Judge
-
20-Mar-2021
Respondent Evidence
Judge
-
10-Mar-2021
Respondent Evidence
Judge
-
23-Feb-2021
Respondent Evidence
Judge
-
09-Feb-2021
Respondent Evidence
Judge
-
04-Feb-2021
Evidence
Judge
-
16-Jan-2021
Evidence
Judge
-
18-Dec-2020
Evidence
Judge
-
12-Nov-2020
Evidence
Judge
-
16-Oct-2020
Evidence
Judge
-
18-Sep-2020
Evidence
Judge
-
21-Aug-2020
Evidence
Judge
-
18-Jul-2020
Evidence
Judge
-
19-Jun-2020
Evidence
Judge
-
05-Jun-2020
Evidence
Judge
-
29-May-2020
Evidence
Judge
-
08-May-2020
Evidence
Judge
-
18-Apr-2020
Evidence
Judge
-
20-Mar-2020
Evidence
Judge
-
06-Mar-2020
Evidence
Judge
-
17-Feb-2020
Evidence
Judge
-
24-Jan-2020
Evidence
Judge
-
10-Jan-2020
Evidence
Judge
-
02-Jan-2020
Evidence
Judge
-
13-Dec-2019
Evidence
Judge
-
16-Nov-2019
Evidence
Judge
-
18-Oct-2019
Evidence
Judge
-
27-Sep-2019
Evidence
Judge
-
14-Sep-2019
Evidence
Judge
-
11-Sep-2019
Evidence
Judge
-
16-Aug-2019
Evidence
Judge
-
09-Aug-2019
Evidence
Judge
-
19-Jul-2019
Respondent Evidence
Judge
-
05-Jul-2019
Respondent Evidence
Judge
-
28-Jun-2019
Evidence
Judge
-
20-Jun-2019
Written Statement
Judge
-
15-Jun-2019
Written Statement
Judge
-
07-Jun-2019
Written Statement
Judge
-
01-Jun-2019
Written Statement
Judge
-
30-May-2019
Written Statement
Judge
-
24-May-2019
Written Statement
Judge
-
30-Apr-2019
Written Statement
Judge
-
16-Apr-2019
Written Statement
Judge
-
26-Mar-2019
Written Statement
Judge
-
07-Mar-2019
Order ExhibitView PDF
-
07-Mar-2019
Written Statement
Judge
-
06-Mar-2019
Order on Exh
Judge
-
02-Mar-2019
Appearance
Judge
-
26-Feb-2019
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
26-Feb-2019
Case filed
Registration No. 6/2019
Case Summary Court: Labour Court, Bhandara Case: ULP 06/2019 (Judgment on Preliminary Issues) Date: 12/10/2022 The Labour Court declared that while the departmental enquiry against bus conductor Prashant Devidas Pande was conducted fairly and in accordance with principles of natural justice, the Enquiry Officer's findings declaring him guilty of consuming liquor on duty are perverse and unreliable. The court found the officer relied solely on a medical certificate noting alcohol smell on the complainant's breath, despite the same certificate confirming he showed no other signs of intoxication and explicitly stating he was not under influence of liquor; additionally, no chemical analysis report was produced and no FIR was filed against the complainant (unlike the driver). The case proceeds to hearing on remaining issues with the respondent Corporation directed to lead evidence to justify its dismissal action. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts