Ganesh Shriram Choudhary, Lakhani Bhandara. vs Gram Panchyat Nimgaon Through its Sarpanch Advocate - Sudhakar D. Shionkar — 3/2025
Case under Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act Section 28,30. Status: Further Chief. Next hearing: 27th March 2026.
Complaint ULP
CNR: MHLC360000192025
Next Hearing
27th March 2026
Filing Number
20/2025
Filing Date
11-02-2025
Registration No
3/2025
Registration Date
11-02-2025
Court
Labour Court, Bhandara
Judge
1-JUDGE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ganesh Shriram Choudhary, Lakhani Bhandara.
Adv. S. K. Laddhani
Respondent(s)
Gram Panchyat Nimgaon Through its Sarpanch Advocate - Sudhakar D. Shionkar
Grampanchayat Nimgaon, through its Secretary/ Gramsewak.
Gram panchyat Nimgaon Through its Secretary/Gramsewak
Adv. Sudhakar D. Shionkar
Gram panchyat Nimgaon Through its Secretary/Gramsewak
Adv. Sudhakar D. Shionkar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-JUDGE
Further Chief
Further Chief
Further Chief
Further Chief
Further Chief
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Further Chief |
| 06-02-2026 | Further Chief |
| 09-01-2026 | Further Chief |
| 05-12-2025 | Further Chief |
| 14-11-2025 | Further Chief |
Interim Orders
SUMMARY: The Labour Court, Bhandara rejected the interim relief application filed by Ganesh Shriram Choudhary under the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971. The court found no prima facie case in the complainant's favor, as documents showed he was terminated due to unsatisfactory work performance and behavioral issues (including threats and misconduct), not unfair labor practices. The court determined that no balance of convenience favored the complainant and no irreparable loss would result from the rejection. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY: The Labour Court, Bhandara rejected the interim relief application filed by Ganesh Shriram Choudhary under the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971. The court found no prima facie case in the complainant's favor, as documents showed he was terminated due to unsatisfactory work performance and behavioral issues (including threats and misconduct), not unfair labor practices. The court determined that no balance of convenience favored the complainant and no irreparable loss would result from the rejection. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts