Ramkrushna S/o. Ghanshyam Nikhade. vs MSRTC, Through its Divisional Traffic Officer, Bhandara. Advocate - Sunil Gulabrao Chopkar — 3/2026
Case under Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act Section 28,30(2). Status: Issues. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.
Complaint ULP
CNR: MHLC360000082026
Filing Number
8/2026
Filing Date
13-Feb-2026
Registration No
3/2026
Registration Date
13-Feb-2026
Court
Labour Court, Bhandara
Judge
1-Judge
Last updated 26-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Ramkrushna S/o. Ghanshyam Nikhade.
Adv. Sachin Eknath Raghorte
Respondent(s)
-
1.MSRTC, Through its Divisional Traffic Officer, Bhandara. Advocate - Sunil Gulabrao Chopkar
Case History
-
10-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-Mar-2026
Order below Exh. 2View PDF
CASE SUMMARY: The Labour Court, Bhandara rejected an interim relief application filed by bus conductor Ramkrushna Nikhade under Section 30(2) of the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971. The court found no prima facie case, no balance of convenience in the complainant's favor, and no irreparable loss, as the complainant can be reinstated with back wages if he succeeds in the main complaint. The allegations of misappropriation (failing to issue a ticket for Rs. 10 recovered from a passenger) were deemed serious misconduct involving breach of trust, and the departmental enquiry was found to have followed principles of natural justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-Mar-2026
Issues
Judge
-
27-Feb-2026
Further Hearing
Judge
-
20-Feb-2026
Further Hearing
Judge
-
13-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 3/2026
CASE SUMMARY: The Labour Court, Bhandara rejected an interim relief application filed by bus conductor Ramkrushna Nikhade under Section 30(2) of the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971. The court found no prima facie case, no balance of convenience in the complainant's favor, and no irreparable loss, as the complainant can be reinstated with back wages if he succeeds in the main complaint. The allegations of misappropriation (failing to issue a ticket for Rs. 10 recovered from a passenger) were deemed serious misconduct involving breach of trust, and the departmental enquiry was found to have followed principles of natural justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts