Ramkrushna S/o. Ghanshyam Nikhade. vs MSRTC, Through its Divisional Traffic Officer, Bhandara. Advocate - Sunil Gulabrao Chopkar — 3/2026

Case under Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act Section 28,30(2). Status: Issues. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.

Complaint ULP

CNR: MHLC360000082026

Issues

Next Hearing

10th April 2026

Filing Number

8/2026

Filing Date

13-02-2026

Registration No

3/2026

Registration Date

13-02-2026

Court

Labour Court, Bhandara

Judge

1-JUDGE

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act Section 28,30(2)

Petitioner(s)

Ramkrushna S/o. Ghanshyam Nikhade.

Adv. Sachin Eknath Raghorte

Respondent(s)

MSRTC, Through its Divisional Traffic Officer, Bhandara. Advocate - Sunil Gulabrao Chopkar

Hearing History

Judge: 1-JUDGE

06-03-2026

Issues

27-02-2026

Further Hearing

20-02-2026

Further Hearing

13-02-2026

Hearing On Exh.

Interim Orders

06-03-2026
Order below Exh. 2

CASE SUMMARY: The Labour Court, Bhandara rejected an interim relief application filed by bus conductor Ramkrushna Nikhade under Section 30(2) of the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971. The court found no prima facie case, no balance of convenience in the complainant's favor, and no irreparable loss, as the complainant can be reinstated with back wages if he succeeds in the main complaint. The allegations of misappropriation (failing to issue a ticket for Rs. 10 recovered from a passenger) were deemed serious misconduct involving breach of trust, and the departmental enquiry was found to have followed principles of natural justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

CASE SUMMARY: The Labour Court, Bhandara rejected an interim relief application filed by bus conductor Ramkrushna Nikhade under Section 30(2) of the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971. The court found no prima facie case, no balance of convenience in the complainant's favor, and no irreparable loss, as the complainant can be reinstated with back wages if he succeeds in the main complaint. The allegations of misappropriation (failing to issue a ticket for Rs. 10 recovered from a passenger) were deemed serious misconduct involving breach of trust, and the departmental enquiry was found to have followed principles of natural justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Labour Court, Bhandara All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case