Ramkrushna S/o. Ghanshyam Nikhade. vs MSRTC, Through its Divisional Traffic Officer, Bhandara. Advocate - Sunil Gulabrao Chopkar — 3/2026
Case under Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act Section 28,30(2). Status: Issues. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.
Complaint ULP
CNR: MHLC360000082026
Next Hearing
10th April 2026
Filing Number
8/2026
Filing Date
13-02-2026
Registration No
3/2026
Registration Date
13-02-2026
Court
Labour Court, Bhandara
Judge
1-JUDGE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ramkrushna S/o. Ghanshyam Nikhade.
Adv. Sachin Eknath Raghorte
Respondent(s)
MSRTC, Through its Divisional Traffic Officer, Bhandara. Advocate - Sunil Gulabrao Chopkar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-JUDGE
Issues
Further Hearing
Further Hearing
Hearing On Exh.
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Issues |
| 27-02-2026 | Further Hearing |
| 20-02-2026 | Further Hearing |
| 13-02-2026 | Hearing On Exh. |
Interim Orders
CASE SUMMARY: The Labour Court, Bhandara rejected an interim relief application filed by bus conductor Ramkrushna Nikhade under Section 30(2) of the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971. The court found no prima facie case, no balance of convenience in the complainant's favor, and no irreparable loss, as the complainant can be reinstated with back wages if he succeeds in the main complaint. The allegations of misappropriation (failing to issue a ticket for Rs. 10 recovered from a passenger) were deemed serious misconduct involving breach of trust, and the departmental enquiry was found to have followed principles of natural justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
CASE SUMMARY: The Labour Court, Bhandara rejected an interim relief application filed by bus conductor Ramkrushna Nikhade under Section 30(2) of the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971. The court found no prima facie case, no balance of convenience in the complainant's favor, and no irreparable loss, as the complainant can be reinstated with back wages if he succeeds in the main complaint. The allegations of misappropriation (failing to issue a ticket for Rs. 10 recovered from a passenger) were deemed serious misconduct involving breach of trust, and the departmental enquiry was found to have followed principles of natural justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts