Sachin shrawan Kulmethe vs M.S.R.T.C. Gadchiroli Advocate - Deshpande Umesh Vijayrao — 67/2023
Case under Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 Section 28302. Status: Order Below Exh................ Next hearing: 09th April 2026.
Comp.ULP
CNR: MHLC340003022023
Next Hearing
09th April 2026
Filing Number
348/2023
Filing Date
19-12-2023
Registration No
67/2023
Registration Date
19-12-2023
Court
Labour Court,Chandrapur
Judge
1-Judge,Labour Court, Chandrapur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sachin shrawan Kulmethe
Adv. Patil Jaipal Mansaram
Respondent(s)
M.S.R.T.C. Gadchiroli Advocate - Deshpande Umesh Vijayrao
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Judge,Labour Court, Chandrapur
Order Below Exh...............
Order Below Exh...............
Order Below Exh...............
Order Below Exh...............
Hearing on Preliminary Issues
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Order Below Exh............... |
| 12-02-2026 | Order Below Exh............... |
| 29-01-2026 | Order Below Exh............... |
| 27-01-2026 | Order Below Exh............... |
| 18-12-2025 | Hearing on Preliminary Issues |
Interim Orders
The Labour Court, Chandrapur granted interim relief to bus driver Sachin Shrawan Kulmethe by restraining Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation from dismissing him pending the main complaint's decision. The court found the complainant established a prima facie case of procedural violations in the departmental enquiry, notably the failure to examine any witnesses despite serious misconduct charges, thereby favoring interim protection of his employment status. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Labour Court, Chandrapur granted interim relief to bus driver Sachin Shrawan Kulmethe by restraining Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation from dismissing him pending the main complaint's decision. The court found the complainant established a prima facie case of procedural violations in the departmental enquiry, notably the failure to examine any witnesses despite serious misconduct charges, thereby favoring interim protection of his employment status. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts