Yogesh Ashok Baraikar vs MSEDCL, Through its Exe. Engi. MSEDCL Ballarpur Division Advocate - Pachpor Abhay Prabhakar — 84/2024
Case under Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 Section 28. Status: Hearing on Interim Relief. Next hearing: 27th March 2026.
Comp.ULP
CNR: MHLC340002572024
Next Hearing
27th March 2026
Filing Number
281/2024
Filing Date
23-11-2024
Registration No
84/2024
Registration Date
23-11-2024
Court
Labour Court,Chandrapur
Judge
1-Judge,Labour Court, Chandrapur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Yogesh Ashok Baraikar
Adv. Patil Jaipal Mansaram
Respondent(s)
MSEDCL, Through its Exe. Engi. MSEDCL Ballarpur Division Advocate - Pachpor Abhay Prabhakar
EXecutive Engineer , MSEDCL Ballarpur Division
Appellate Authority, Under MSEDCL Dicipline and Appeal Rules and Supritending Enginneer
Junior Engineer MSEDCL Korpana DC
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Judge,Labour Court, Chandrapur
Hearing on Interim Relief
Hearing on Interim Relief
Hearing on Interim Relief
Hearing on Interim Relief
Hearing on Interim Relief
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Hearing on Interim Relief |
| 02-03-2026 | Hearing on Interim Relief |
| 26-02-2026 | Hearing on Interim Relief |
| 13-02-2026 | Hearing on Interim Relief |
| 06-02-2026 | Hearing on Interim Relief |
Interim Orders
Summary: In Complaint(ULP).84/2024 between Yogesh Baraikar and MSEDCL, Chandrapur, the Labour Court, Chandrapur allowed the respondent's application dated 26/03/2025. The court granted permission to the respondent to file necessary documents on record, finding that the documents are essential to resolve the controversy between parties and that allowing their production would cause no prejudice to the complainant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In Complaint(ULP).84/2024 between Yogesh Baraikar and MSEDCL, Chandrapur, the Labour Court, Chandrapur allowed the respondent's application dated 26/03/2025. The court granted permission to the respondent to file necessary documents on record, finding that the documents are essential to resolve the controversy between parties and that allowing their production would cause no prejudice to the complainant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts