Manohar tikaram Shende vs The Chandrapur District Central Co-operative Bank Ltd Civil line Chandrapur through its C.E.O. Advocate - Chankapure Adv — 10/2021
Case under Industrial Disput Act, 1947 Section 33. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT on 06th March 2026.
Appln.IDA
CNR: MHLC340000982021
Filing Number
114/2021
Filing Date
04-09-2021
Registration No
10/2021
Registration Date
04-09-2021
Court
Labour Court,Chandrapur
Judge
1-Judge,Labour Court, Chandrapur
Decision Date
06th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Manohar tikaram Shende
Adv. Rahate Ekta Atul
Respondent(s)
The Chandrapur District Central Co-operative Bank Ltd Civil line Chandrapur through its C.E.O. Advocate - Chankapure Adv
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Judge,Labour Court, Chandrapur
Disposed
Argument
Argument
Argument
Order Below Exh...............
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-02-2026 | Argument |
| 29-01-2026 | Argument |
| 12-01-2026 | Argument |
| 22-12-2025 | Order Below Exh............... |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Labour Court, Chandrapur partly allowed the application of retired bank employee Manohar Tikaram Shende against Chandrapur District Central Co-operative Bank. The court held that the applicant was entitled to recover Rs. 2,54,976 as salary for 90 days of work performed during his leave period (April-July 2020) after the bank explicitly authorized him to work and promised payment, finding the bank's subsequent refusal to pay constituted unfair labour practice. However, the court reduced the claimed interest from 12% to 6% per annum, deeming the higher rate excessive, and also awarded Rs. 2,000 as costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Court Decision Summary The Labour Court, Chandrapur partly allowed the application of retired bank employee Manohar Tikaram Shende against Chandrapur District Central Co-operative Bank. The court held that the applicant was entitled to recover Rs. 2,54,976 as salary for 90 days of work performed during his leave period (April-July 2020) after the bank explicitly authorized him to work and promised payment, finding the bank's subsequent refusal to pay constituted unfair labour practice. However, the court reduced the claimed interest from 12% to 6% per annum, deeming the higher rate excessive, and also awarded Rs. 2,000 as costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts