Shridhar Gajananrao Wat vs Chief Administrative Officer , Maha. Jiwan Pradhikaran CIDCO Bhawan mumbai Advocate - Patil Jaipal Mansaram — 21/2021
Case under Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 Section 4. Status: Verification. Next hearing: 06th April 2026.
Appln.PGA
CNR: MHLC340000612021
Next Hearing
06th April 2026
Filing Number
66/2021
Filing Date
05-04-2021
Registration No
21/2021
Registration Date
05-04-2021
Court
Labour Court,Chandrapur
Judge
1-Judge,Labour Court, Chandrapur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shridhar Gajananrao Wat
Adv. Khelkar Wasudeo Mahadeo
Respondent(s)
Chief Administrative Officer , Maha. Jiwan Pradhikaran CIDCO Bhawan mumbai Advocate - Patil Jaipal Mansaram
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Judge,Labour Court, Chandrapur
Verification
Verification
Verification
Verification
Verification
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | Verification |
| 06-03-2026 | Verification |
| 23-02-2026 | Verification |
| 30-01-2026 | Verification |
| 12-01-2026 | Verification |
Interim Orders
Summary: The appeal is dismissed. The court upheld the original order regarding the petitioner's wage fixation and arrears. The petitioner, a pump operator, was entitled to a wage scale of Rs. 250-435 as per the pump operator classification, and the court rejected claims for enhanced wages or additional arrears. The court determined that the petitioner received appropriate compensation of Rs. 2,72,095 as back wages and rejected demands for Rs. 5,64,509 claimed by the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The appeal is dismissed. The court upheld the original order regarding the petitioner's wage fixation and arrears. The petitioner, a pump operator, was entitled to a wage scale of Rs. 250-435 as per the pump operator classification, and the court rejected claims for enhanced wages or additional arrears. The court determined that the petitioner received appropriate compensation of Rs. 2,72,095 as back wages and rejected demands for Rs. 5,64,509 claimed by the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts