Vilas Govindrao Pendam vs M.S.R.T.C. Gadchiroli Advocate - Deshpande Umesh Vijayrao — 12/2024
Case under Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 Section 28and302. Status: Order Below Exh................ Next hearing: 09th April 2026.
Comp.ULP
CNR: MHLC340000192024
Filing Number
27/2024
Filing Date
25-Jan-2024
Registration No
12/2024
Registration Date
25-Jan-2024
Court
Labour Court,Chandrapur
Judge
1-Judge,Labour Court, Chandrapur
Last updated 26-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Vilas Govindrao Pendam
Adv. V. M. Shikare Rep.
Respondent(s)
-
1.M.S.R.T.C. Gadchiroli Advocate - Deshpande Umesh Vijayrao
Case History
-
09-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-Mar-2026
Order Below Exh...............
Judge,Labour Court, Chandrapur
-
12-Feb-2026
Order Below Exh...............
Judge,Labour Court, Chandrapur
-
29-Jan-2026
Order Below Exh...............
Judge,Labour Court, Chandrapur
-
27-Jan-2026
Order Below Exh...............
Judge,Labour Court, Chandrapur
-
18-Dec-2025
Hearing on Preliminary Issues
Judge,Labour Court, Chandrapur
-
06-Nov-2025
Hearing on Preliminary Issues
Judge,Labour Court, Chandrapur
-
25-Sep-2025
Issues
Judge,Labour Court, Chandrapur
-
21-Aug-2025
Issues
Judge,Labour Court, Chandrapur
-
22-Jul-2025
Issues
Judge,Labour Court, Chandrapur
-
12-Jun-2025
Issues
Judge,Labour Court, Chandrapur
-
09-Apr-2025
Issues
Judge,Labour Court, Chandrapur
-
27-Feb-2025
Issues
Judge,Labour Court, Chandrapur
-
03-Feb-2025
Order below Exh.View PDF
Summary: The Labour Court, Chandrapur allowed the interim relief application filed by conductor Vilas Govindrao Pendam under Section 30(2) of the MRTU & PULP Act, finding he established a prima facie case of unfair labour practice. The court found serious defects in the departmental enquiry—including its completion within a single day, lack of supporting documentation for alleged financial losses, absence of a finding regarding willful absence, and dismissal punishment not provided under the applicable discipline rules—warranting court adjudication on merit. Accordingly, the court restrained respondents (Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation) from dismissing the complainant pending final decision of the main complaint. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
03-Feb-2025
Issues
Judge,Labour Court, Chandrapur
-
23-Jan-2025
Hearing on Interim Relief
Judge,Labour Court, Chandrapur
-
17-Jan-2025
Hearing on Interim Relief
Judge,Labour Court, Chandrapur
-
17-Dec-2024
Hearing on Interim Relief
Judge,Labour Court, Chandrapur
-
26-Nov-2024
Hearing on Interim Relief
Judge,Labour Court, Chandrapur
-
22-Oct-2024
Hearing on Interim Relief
Judge,Labour Court, Chandrapur
-
08-Oct-2024
Hearing on Interim Relief
Judge,Labour Court, Chandrapur
-
03-Oct-2024
Hearing on Interim Relief
Judge,Labour Court, Chandrapur
-
26-Sep-2024
Hearing on Interim Relief
Judge,Labour Court, Chandrapur
-
29-Aug-2024
Hearing below Exh...........
Judge,Labour Court, Chandrapur
-
14-Aug-2024
Hearing below Exh...........
Judge,Labour Court, Chandrapur
-
24-Jul-2024
Hearing below Exh...........
Judge,Labour Court, Chandrapur
-
05-Jul-2024
Hearing below Exh...........
Judge,Labour Court, Chandrapur
-
07-Jun-2024
Hearing below Exh...........
Judge,Labour Court, Chandrapur
-
22-May-2024
Hearing below Exh...........
Judge,Labour Court, Chandrapur
-
22-Apr-2024
Hearing below Exh...........
Judge,Labour Court, Chandrapur
-
05-Apr-2024
Hearing below Exh...........
Judge,Labour Court, Chandrapur
-
13-Mar-2024
Hearing below Exh...........
Judge,Labour Court, Chandrapur
-
20-Feb-2024
Reply
Judge,Labour Court, Chandrapur
-
08-Feb-2024
Reply
Judge,Labour Court, Chandrapur
-
25-Jan-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
25-Jan-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 12/2024
Summary: The Labour Court, Chandrapur allowed the interim relief application filed by conductor Vilas Govindrao Pendam under Section 30(2) of the MRTU & PULP Act, finding he established a prima facie case of unfair labour practice. The court found serious defects in the departmental enquiry—including its completion within a single day, lack of supporting documentation for alleged financial losses, absence of a finding regarding willful absence, and dismissal punishment not provided under the applicable discipline rules—warranting court adjudication on merit. Accordingly, the court restrained respondents (Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation) from dismissing the complainant pending final decision of the main complaint. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts