Ravindra Hiraman Gowardhan vs M.S.R.T.C. Gadchiroli Advocate - Deshpande Umesh Vijayrao — 5/2024

Case under Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 Section 28302. Status: Respondent Evidence. Next hearing: 07th April 2026.

Comp.ULP

CNR: MHLC340000102024

Respondent Evidence

Next Hearing

07th April 2026

Filing Number

17/2024

Filing Date

15-01-2024

Registration No

5/2024

Registration Date

15-01-2024

Court

Labour Court,Chandrapur

Judge

1-Judge,Labour Court, Chandrapur

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 Section 28302
IA/1/2025 Classification : Application for Interim Relief Section Ravindra Hiraman GowardhanM.S.R.T.C. Gadchiroli

Petitioner(s)

Ravindra Hiraman Gowardhan

Adv. Wankhade Milind Manoharrao

Respondent(s)

M.S.R.T.C. Gadchiroli Advocate - Deshpande Umesh Vijayrao

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Judge,Labour Court, Chandrapur

06-03-2026

Respondent Evidence

10-02-2026

Respondent Evidence

06-01-2026

Respondent Evidence

09-12-2025

Hearing on Preliminary Issues

11-11-2025

Hearing on Preliminary Issues

Interim Orders

06-01-2026
Order below Exh.

Case Summary Case: ULP No. 05/2024 - Labour Court, Chandrapur Outcome: The court declared the departmental enquiry against the complainant (a bus conductor) as unfair and in violation of natural justice principles, and found the enquiry officer's findings to be perverse. The respondent (MSRTC) is now directed to lead fresh evidence to prove misconduct, with the complainant having opportunity to rebut. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Case: ULP No. 05/2024 - Labour Court, Chandrapur Outcome: The court declared the departmental enquiry against the complainant (a bus conductor) as unfair and in violation of natural justice principles, and found the enquiry officer's findings to be perverse. The respondent (MSRTC) is now directed to lead fresh evidence to prove misconduct, with the complainant having opportunity to rebut. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Labour Court,Chandrapur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case