Ravindra Hiraman Gowardhan vs M.S.R.T.C. Gadchiroli Advocate - Deshpande Umesh Vijayrao — 5/2024

Case under Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 Section 28302. Status: Respondent Evidence. Next hearing: 07th April 2026.

Respondent Evidence Next hearing 07-Apr-2026 this date has passed

Comp.ULP

CNR: MHLC340000102024

Filing Number

17/2024

Filing Date

15-Jan-2024

Registration No

5/2024

Registration Date

15-Jan-2024

Court

Labour Court,Chandrapur

Judge

1-Judge,Labour Court, Chandrapur

Last updated 26-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 Section 28302

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Ravindra Hiraman Gowardhan

    Adv. Wankhade Milind Manoharrao

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.M.S.R.T.C. Gadchiroli Advocate - Deshpande Umesh Vijayrao

Case History

  1. 07-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Respondent Evidence

    Judge,Labour Court, Chandrapur

  3. 10-Feb-2026

    Respondent Evidence

    Judge,Labour Court, Chandrapur

  4. 06-Jan-2026

    Order below Exh.View PDF

    Case Summary Case: ULP No. 05/2024 - Labour Court, Chandrapur Outcome: The court declared the departmental enquiry against the complainant (a bus conductor) as unfair and in violation of natural justice principles, and found the enquiry officer's findings to be perverse. The respondent (MSRTC) is now directed to lead fresh evidence to prove misconduct, with the complainant having opportunity to rebut. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 06-Jan-2026

    Respondent Evidence

    Judge,Labour Court, Chandrapur

  6. 09-Dec-2025

    Hearing on Preliminary Issues

    Judge,Labour Court, Chandrapur

  7. 11-Nov-2025

    Hearing on Preliminary Issues

    Judge,Labour Court, Chandrapur

  8. 03-Oct-2025

    Hearing on Preliminary Issues

    Judge,Labour Court, Chandrapur

  9. 02-Sep-2025

    Issues

    Judge,Labour Court, Chandrapur

  10. 29-Jul-2025

    Issues

    Judge,Labour Court, Chandrapur

  11. 24-Jun-2025

    Issues

    Judge,Labour Court, Chandrapur

  12. 29-Apr-2025

    Issues

    Judge,Labour Court, Chandrapur

  13. 28-Mar-2025

    Order below Exh.View PDF

  14. 28-Mar-2025

    Issues

    Judge,Labour Court, Chandrapur

  15. 18-Mar-2025

    Hearing on Interim Relief

    Judge,Labour Court, Chandrapur

  16. 28-Feb-2025

    Hearing on Interim Relief

    Judge,Labour Court, Chandrapur

  17. 11-Feb-2025

    Hearing on Interim Relief

    Judge,Labour Court, Chandrapur

  18. 24-Jan-2025

    Hearing on Interim Relief

    Judge,Labour Court, Chandrapur

  19. 14-Jan-2025

    Hearing on Interim Relief

    Judge,Labour Court, Chandrapur

  20. 17-Dec-2024

    Hearing on Interim Relief

    Judge,Labour Court, Chandrapur

  21. 22-Nov-2024

    Hearing on Interim Relief

    Judge,Labour Court, Chandrapur

  22. 22-Oct-2024

    Reply

    Judge,Labour Court, Chandrapur

  23. 04-Oct-2024

    Reply

    Judge,Labour Court, Chandrapur

  24. 10-Sep-2024

    Reply

    Judge,Labour Court, Chandrapur

  25. 09-Aug-2024

    Reply

    Judge,Labour Court, Chandrapur

  26. 30-Jul-2024

    Reply

    Judge,Labour Court, Chandrapur

  27. 21-Jun-2024

    Reply

    Judge,Labour Court, Chandrapur

  28. 14-May-2024

    Reply

    Judge,Labour Court, Chandrapur

  29. 02-Apr-2024

    Reply

    Judge,Labour Court, Chandrapur

  30. 12-Mar-2024

    Reply

    Judge,Labour Court, Chandrapur

  31. 13-Feb-2024

    Reply

    Judge,Labour Court, Chandrapur

  32. 15-Jan-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  33. 15-Jan-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 5/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Case: ULP No. 05/2024 - Labour Court, Chandrapur Outcome: The court declared the departmental enquiry against the complainant (a bus conductor) as unfair and in violation of natural justice principles, and found the enquiry officer's findings to be perverse. The respondent (MSRTC) is now directed to lead fresh evidence to prove misconduct, with the complainant having opportunity to rebut. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case