Vasanta Rajaram Bawne vs Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Buldana Advocate - Khatri SM — 5/2024
Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 33(2). Status: Citation. Next hearing: 04th April 2026.
Appln-IDA - Application
CNR: MHLC280001132024
Filing Number
120/2024
Filing Date
13-Jun-2024
Registration No
5/2024
Registration Date
13-Jun-2024
Court
Labour Court,Buldhana
Judge
1-Judge, Labour Court
Last updated 26-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Vasanta Rajaram Bawne
Adv. Smt. G. S. Gaikwad
Respondent(s)
-
1.Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Buldana Advocate - Khatri SM
-
2.Group Development Officer
Case History
-
04-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
18-Mar-2026
Citation
Judge, Labour Court
-
06-Mar-2026
Citation
Judge, Labour Court
-
20-Feb-2026
Citation
Judge, Labour Court
-
07-Feb-2026
Citation
Judge, Labour Court
-
03-Feb-2026
Citation
Judge, Labour Court
-
27-Jan-2026
Respondents Argument
Judge, Labour Court
-
21-Jan-2026
Respondents Argument
Judge, Labour Court
-
17-Jan-2026
Respondents Argument
Judge, Labour Court
-
13-Jan-2026
Argument
Judge, Labour Court
-
06-Jan-2026
Argument
Judge, Labour Court
-
30-Dec-2025
Argument
Judge, Labour Court
-
23-Dec-2025
Argument
Judge, Labour Court
-
16-Dec-2025
Argument
Judge, Labour Court
-
09-Dec-2025
Respondents Evidence
Judge, Labour Court
-
19-Nov-2025
Respondents Evidence
Judge, Labour Court
-
11-Nov-2025
Respondents Evidence
Judge, Labour Court
-
09-Oct-2025
Respondents Evidence
Judge, Labour Court
-
10-Sep-2025
Order below Exh---View PDF
The petition filed by the applicant has been allowed. The court permitted the applicant to file documents on record, finding that allowing such filing would not prejudice the respondent's rights and that the documents are essential to the case. The court rejected the respondent's objections and disposed of the petition accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Sep-2025
Respondents Evidence
Judge, Labour Court
-
26-Aug-2025
Evidence
Judge, Labour Court
-
12-Aug-2025
EvidenceView PDF
-
12-Aug-2025
Evidence
Judge, Labour Court
-
05-Aug-2025
Cross Examination
Judge, Labour Court
-
29-Jul-2025
Cross Examination
Judge, Labour Court
-
15-Jul-2025
Evidence
Judge, Labour Court
-
08-Jul-2025
Evidence
Judge, Labour Court
-
27-Jun-2025
Evidence
Judge, Labour Court
-
17-Jun-2025
Evidence
Judge, Labour Court
-
13-Jun-2025
Evidence
Judge, Labour Court
-
03-Jun-2025
Evidence
Judge, Labour Court
-
27-May-2025
Order below Exh---View PDF
-
27-May-2025
Evidence
Judge, Labour Court
-
07-May-2025
Hearing
Judge, Labour Court
-
30-Apr-2025
Hearing
Judge, Labour Court
-
25-Apr-2025
Hearing
Judge, Labour Court
-
16-Apr-2025
Hearing
Judge, Labour Court
-
08-Apr-2025
Say
Judge, Labour Court
-
18-Mar-2025
Say
Judge, Labour Court
-
05-Mar-2025
Evidence
Judge, Labour Court
-
25-Feb-2025
Evidence
Judge, Labour Court
-
11-Feb-2025
Evidence
Judge, Labour Court
-
03-Feb-2025
Evidence
Judge, Labour Court
-
28-Jan-2025
Evidence
Judge, Labour Court
-
21-Jan-2025
Evidence
Judge, Labour Court
-
06-Jan-2025
Evidence
Judge, Labour Court
-
23-Dec-2024
Evidence
Judge, Labour Court
-
09-Dec-2024
Evidence
Judge, Labour Court
-
19-Nov-2024
Evidence
Judge, Labour Court
-
04-Nov-2024
Issues
Judge, Labour Court
-
14-Oct-2024
Order below Exh---View PDF
-
14-Oct-2024
Issues
Judge, Labour Court
-
23-Sep-2024
Say
Judge, Labour Court
-
09-Sep-2024
Written Statement
Judge, Labour Court
-
26-Aug-2024
Written Statement
Judge, Labour Court
-
12-Aug-2024
Written Statement
Judge, Labour Court
-
22-Jul-2024
Written Statement
Judge, Labour Court
-
08-Jul-2024
Report
Judge, Labour Court
-
24-Jun-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-Jun-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 5/2024
The petition filed by the applicant has been allowed. The court permitted the applicant to file documents on record, finding that allowing such filing would not prejudice the respondent's rights and that the documents are essential to the case. The court rejected the respondent's objections and disposed of the petition accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts