Ajaz Ahemad Shaikh Chand vs Divisional Controller MSRTC Buldana Advocate - Kashikar RM — 5/2025

Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 33. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT on 06th March 2026.

Appln-IDA - Application

CNR: MHLC280000852025

Case disposed

Filing Number

88/2025

Filing Date

16-07-2025

Registration No

5/2025

Registration Date

16-07-2025

Court

Labour Court,Buldhana

Judge

1-Judge, Labour Court

Decision Date

06th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT

Acts & Sections

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 33

Petitioner(s)

Ajaz Ahemad Shaikh Chand

Adv. Gawande GR

Respondent(s)

Divisional Controller MSRTC Buldana Advocate - Kashikar RM

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Judge, Labour Court

06-03-2026

Disposed

27-02-2026

Argument

20-02-2026

Argument

13-02-2026

Cross Examination

07-02-2026

Cross Examination

Final Orders / Judgements

06-03-2026
Judgement

Case Summary The court granted the applicant's petition under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Section 33-C(2), directing the respondent (Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation) to pay the applicant Rs. 1,04,896 as the balance of salary arrears along with 10% interest from February 21, 2025, payable within 30 days. The court found that while the applicant was entitled to the full wage differential amount calculated for the period from service confirmation through retirement, the respondent had already paid Rs. 6,39,892 in a previous case judgment, leaving only the remaining balance due. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

16-12-2025
Evidence
casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The court granted the applicant's petition under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Section 33-C(2), directing the respondent (Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation) to pay the applicant Rs. 1,04,896 as the balance of salary arrears along with 10% interest from February 21, 2025, payable within 30 days. The court found that while the applicant was entitled to the full wage differential amount calculated for the period from service confirmation through retirement, the respondent had already paid Rs. 6,39,892 in a previous case judgment, leaving only the remaining balance due. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Labour Court,Buldhana All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case