Ashok Tryambak Mule vs Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Buldana Advocate - Khatri SM — 23/2024
Case under Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 Section 7(4). Status: Argument. Next hearing: 09th April 2026.
Appln. PGA - PGA
CNR: MHLC280000312024
Filing Number
31/2024
Filing Date
15-Jan-2024
Registration No
23/2024
Registration Date
15-Jan-2024
Court
Labour Court,Buldhana
Judge
1-Judge, Labour Court
Last updated 26-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Ashok Tryambak Mule
Adv. Sasankar SS
Respondent(s)
-
1.Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Buldana Advocate - Khatri SM
Case History
-
09-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
16-Mar-2026
Argument
Judge, Labour Court
-
06-Mar-2026
Argument
Judge, Labour Court
-
18-Feb-2026
Argument
Judge, Labour Court
-
09-Feb-2026
Argument
Judge, Labour Court
-
27-Jan-2026
Argument
Judge, Labour Court
-
15-Jan-2026
Argument
Judge, Labour Court
-
11-Dec-2025
Argument
Judge, Labour Court
-
13-Nov-2025
Argument
Judge, Labour Court
-
16-Oct-2025
Argument
Judge, Labour Court
-
25-Sep-2025
Argument
Judge, Labour Court
-
04-Sep-2025
Argument
Judge, Labour Court
-
21-Aug-2025
Argument
Judge, Labour Court
-
31-Jul-2025
Argument
Judge, Labour Court
-
17-Jul-2025
Argument
Judge, Labour Court
-
19-Jun-2025
Argument
Judge, Labour Court
-
17-Jun-2025
Argument
Judge, Labour Court
-
12-Jun-2025
Argument
Judge, Labour Court
-
08-May-2025
Argument
Judge, Labour Court
-
24-Apr-2025
Argument
Judge, Labour Court
-
03-Apr-2025
Argument
Judge, Labour Court
-
13-Mar-2025
Respondents Evidence
Judge, Labour Court
-
15-Feb-2025
Respondents Evidence
Judge, Labour Court
-
13-Feb-2025
Order below Exh---View PDF
Summary: The court petition (Petition No. 23/2024) filed before the Labour Court in Buldhana is dismissed. The court found that the respondent (defendant) had not consistently violated the petitioner's reversal rights as claimed, and the petitioner's arguments lacked factual merit. However, the court directed that the respondent cannot be granted reversal benefits unilaterally and instructed both parties to resolve the matter amicably at the next hearing or face consequences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Feb-2025
Respondents Evidence
Judge, Labour Court
-
30-Jan-2025
Respondents Evidence
Judge, Labour Court
-
09-Jan-2025
Respondents Evidence
Judge, Labour Court
-
24-Dec-2024
Respondents Evidence
Judge, Labour Court
-
12-Dec-2024
Respondents Evidence
Judge, Labour Court
-
28-Nov-2024
Evidence
Judge, Labour Court
-
07-Nov-2024
Cross Examination
Judge, Labour Court
-
22-Oct-2024
Cross Examination
Judge, Labour Court
-
17-Oct-2024
Cross Examination
Judge, Labour Court
-
10-Oct-2024
Cross Examination
Judge, Labour Court
-
01-Oct-2024
Cross Examination
Judge, Labour Court
-
19-Sep-2024
Cross Examination
Judge, Labour Court
-
29-Aug-2024
EvidenceView PDF
-
29-Aug-2024
Cross Examination
Judge, Labour Court
-
08-Aug-2024
Evidence
Judge, Labour Court
-
25-Jul-2024
Evidence
Judge, Labour Court
-
04-Jul-2024
Issues
Judge, Labour Court
-
13-Jun-2024
Ex-parte Evidence
Judge, Labour Court
-
09-May-2024
Ex-parte Evidence
Judge, Labour Court
-
18-Apr-2024
Ex-parte Evidence
Judge, Labour Court
-
08-Apr-2024
Ex-parte Evidence
Judge, Labour Court
-
28-Mar-2024
Appearance
Judge, Labour Court
-
14-Mar-2024
Appearance
Judge, Labour Court
-
29-Feb-2024
Appearance
Judge, Labour Court
-
17-Feb-2024
Appearance
Judge, Labour Court
-
01-Feb-2024
Appearance
Judge, Labour Court
-
18-Jan-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
15-Jan-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 23/2024
Summary: The court petition (Petition No. 23/2024) filed before the Labour Court in Buldhana is dismissed. The court found that the respondent (defendant) had not consistently violated the petitioner's reversal rights as claimed, and the petitioner's arguments lacked factual merit. However, the court directed that the respondent cannot be granted reversal benefits unilaterally and instructed both parties to resolve the matter amicably at the next hearing or face consequences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts