Sanjay Shyamrao Khadse vs Secretary, Vidarbha Youth Welfare Soc., Amravati and anr. — 471/2023

Case under Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 Section 7(4). Status: Argument. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.

Argument Next hearing 10-Apr-2026 this date has passed

Appln PGA 2016

CNR: MHLC270005342023

Filing Number

534/2023

Filing Date

03-Apr-2023

Registration No

471/2023

Registration Date

03-Apr-2023

Court

Labour Court, Amravati

Judge

1-Judge, Labour Court

Last updated 26-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 Section 7(4)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sanjay Shyamrao Khadse

    Adv. S. K. Tekade

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Secretary, Vidarbha Youth Welfare Soc., Amravati and anr.

  2. 2.Principal, Prof. Ram Meghe College o f Engieering and Management, Badnera

Case History

  1. 10-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Argument

    Judge, Labour Court

  3. 21-Jan-2026

    Argument

    Judge, Labour Court

  4. 09-Dec-2025

    Argument

    Judge, Labour Court

  5. 06-Nov-2025

    Argument

    Judge, Labour Court

  6. 19-Sep-2025

    Argument

    Judge, Labour Court

  7. 18-Aug-2025

    Argument

    Judge, Labour Court

  8. 24-Jul-2025

    Argument

    Judge, Labour Court

  9. 02-Jul-2025

    Argument

    Judge, Labour Court

  10. 26-Jun-2025

    Argument

    Judge, Labour Court

  11. 13-Jun-2025

    Argument

    Judge, Labour Court

  12. 22-May-2025

    Argument

    Judge, Labour Court

  13. 19-Mar-2025

    Argument

    Judge, Labour Court

  14. 24-Jan-2025

    Argument

    Judge, Labour Court

  15. 18-Dec-2024

    Argument

    Judge, Labour Court

  16. 25-Nov-2024

    Argument

    Judge, Labour Court

  17. 14-Oct-2024

    Argument

    Judge, Labour Court

  18. 19-Sep-2024

    Argument

    Judge, Labour Court

  19. 03-Aug-2024

    Argument

    Judge, Labour Court

  20. 09-Jul-2024

    Respondents Evidence

    Judge, Labour Court

  21. 11-Jun-2024

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    SUMMARY: In Application PGA No. 471 of 2023 before Labour Court, Amravati, the application for permission to file documents on record was allowed on 11-06-2024. The court permitted the non-applicant (employer) to file joining reports, Government Resolution, and letters from Tantra Shikshan Sanstha as these documents were deemed necessary and relevant for just decision in the gratuity payment dispute. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  22. 11-Jun-2024

    Respondents Evidence

    Judge, Labour Court

  23. 06-May-2024

    Cross Examination

    Judge, Labour Court

  24. 05-May-2024

    Respondents Evidence

    Judge, Labour Court

  25. 12-Mar-2024

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  26. 12-Mar-2024

    Respondents Evidence

    Judge, Labour Court

  27. 20-Feb-2024

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  28. 20-Feb-2024

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  29. 20-Feb-2024

    Cross Examination

    Judge, Labour Court

  30. 05-Feb-2024

    Argument

    Judge, Labour Court

  31. 18-Jan-2024

    Respondents Evidence

    Judge, Labour Court

  32. 09-Dec-2023

    Respondents Evidence

    Judge, Labour Court

  33. 02-Dec-2023

    Respondents Evidence

    Judge, Labour Court

  34. 21-Oct-2023

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  35. 21-Oct-2023

    Cross Examination

    Judge, Labour Court

  36. 05-Sep-2023

    Cross Examination

    Judge, Labour Court

  37. 02-Aug-2023

    Evidence

    Judge, Labour Court

  38. 13-Jun-2023

    Written Statement

    Judge, Labour Court

  39. 10-May-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  40. 03-Apr-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 471/2023

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY: In Application PGA No. 471 of 2023 before Labour Court, Amravati, the application for permission to file documents on record was allowed on 11-06-2024. The court permitted the non-applicant (employer) to file joining reports, Government Resolution, and letters from Tantra Shikshan Sanstha as these documents were deemed necessary and relevant for just decision in the gratuity payment dispute. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case