Nitin Babanrao Mandawgade vs A.P.M.C.Dhamangaon Rly Advocate - A.J. Kadu — 5100014/2013
Case under --- Section 287Item1abd. Status: Respondents Evidence. Next hearing: 06th April 2026.
Comp. ULP - Complaint
CNR: MHLC270000862013
Next Hearing
06th April 2026
Filing Number
5100014/2013
Filing Date
18-03-2013
Registration No
5100014/2013
Registration Date
19-03-2013
Court
Labour Court, Amravati
Judge
1-Judge, Labour Court
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Nitin Babanrao Mandawgade
Adv. D. M. shimali
Respondent(s)
A.P.M.C.Dhamangaon Rly Advocate - A.J. Kadu
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Judge, Labour Court
Respondents Evidence
Respondents Evidence
Respondents Evidence
Respondents Evidence
Respondents Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | Respondents Evidence |
| 16-03-2026 | Respondents Evidence |
| 06-03-2026 | Respondents Evidence |
| 12-02-2026 | Respondents Evidence |
| 10-12-2025 | Respondents Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Labour Court, Amravati - Criminal (ULP) No. 14 of 2013 The application filed by the complainant for permission to file documents on record has been allowed. The court found that the documents (copies of orders and salary registers for March-April 2013) are relevant and necessary for deciding the wrongful termination complaint, overruling the respondent's objection regarding document relevance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Labour Court, Amravati - Criminal (ULP) No. 14 of 2013 The application filed by the complainant for permission to file documents on record has been allowed. The court found that the documents (copies of orders and salary registers for March-April 2013) are relevant and necessary for deciding the wrongful termination complaint, overruling the respondent's objection regarding document relevance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts