Nitin Ganeshrao Umbarkar vs Divisional Controller, M.S.R.T.C. Amravati Advocate - N.S. Raut — 12/2021
Case under Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 Section 28. Status: Respondents Evidence. Next hearing: 04th May 2026.
Comp. ULP - Complaint
CNR: MHLC270000632021
Next Hearing
04th May 2026
Filing Number
63/2021
Filing Date
13-05-2021
Registration No
12/2021
Registration Date
13-05-2021
Court
Labour Court, Amravati
Judge
1-Judge, Labour Court
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Nitin Ganeshrao Umbarkar
Adv. B.S. Sawai Rep
Respondent(s)
Divisional Controller, M.S.R.T.C. Amravati Advocate - N.S. Raut
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Judge, Labour Court
Respondents Evidence
Respondents Evidence
Respondents Evidence
Respondents Evidence
Respondents Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Respondents Evidence |
| 13-01-2026 | Respondents Evidence |
| 06-11-2025 | Respondents Evidence |
| 11-09-2025 | Respondents Evidence |
| 07-08-2025 | Respondents Evidence |
Interim Orders
SUMMARY: The Labour Court, Amravati declared the departmental enquiry against bus driver Nitin Ganeshrao Umbarkar vitiated on preliminary issues, finding it violated principles of natural justice. The court determined the enquiry was unfair because the complainant was denied the opportunity to cross-examine the reporting officer, and the enquiry officer's findings were perverse. The case is now adjourned for the respondent (Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation) to prove the alleged misconduct before the court through evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY: The Labour Court, Amravati declared the departmental enquiry against bus driver Nitin Ganeshrao Umbarkar vitiated on preliminary issues, finding it violated principles of natural justice. The court determined the enquiry was unfair because the complainant was denied the opportunity to cross-examine the reporting officer, and the enquiry officer's findings were perverse. The case is now adjourned for the respondent (Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation) to prove the alleged misconduct before the court through evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts