Prafull Madhukarrao Ridhore vs Commissioner of Health/Mission Director, Health Bombay Advocate - C.B. Pachlore — 10/2021
Case under Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 Section 28. Status: Argument. Next hearing: 17th April 2026.
Comp. ULP - Complaint
CNR: MHLC270000612021
Next Hearing
17th April 2026
Filing Number
61/2021
Filing Date
10-05-2021
Registration No
10/2021
Registration Date
10-05-2021
Court
Labour Court, Amravati
Judge
1-Judge, Labour Court
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Prafull Madhukarrao Ridhore
Adv. D.B. Gawande
Respondent(s)
Commissioner of Health/Mission Director, Health Bombay Advocate - C.B. Pachlore
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Judge, Labour Court
Argument
Argument
Argument
Argument
Argument
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Argument |
| 12-02-2026 | Argument |
| 06-02-2026 | Argument |
| 17-01-2026 | Argument |
| 06-12-2025 | Argument |
Interim Orders
Summary The Labour Court, Amravati rejected the interim application filed by Prafull Madhukarrao Ridhore (ULP Complaint No. 10 of 2021) seeking to stay the termination order dated 05-05-2021 and reinstate him in service. The court found that the complainant failed to establish a prima facie case, as his status as a contractual employee under the National Health Mission scheme for 11-month terms remained disputed and required detailed evidence at trial rather than interim relief. The application was dismissed with costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Labour Court, Amravati rejected the interim application filed by Prafull Madhukarrao Ridhore (ULP Complaint No. 10 of 2021) seeking to stay the termination order dated 05-05-2021 and reinstate him in service. The court found that the complainant failed to establish a prima facie case, as his status as a contractual employee under the National Health Mission scheme for 11-month terms remained disputed and required detailed evidence at trial rather than interim relief. The application was dismissed with costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts