Hrishikesh Holey vs Divisional Controller, M.S.R.T.C, Amravati and 1 Advocate - V.D. Tayade — 13/2018

Case under Industrial Employees Standing Order Act, 1946 Section 28. Status: Hearing on Preliminary Issues. Next hearing: 28th April 2026.

Hearing on Preliminary Issues Next hearing 28-Apr-2026 this date has passed

Comp. ULP - Complaint

CNR: MHLC270000542018

Filing Number

54/2018

Filing Date

24-Apr-2018

Registration No

13/2018

Registration Date

24-Apr-2018

Court

Labour Court, Amravati

Judge

1-Judge, Labour Court

Last updated 26-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Industrial Employees Standing Order Act, 1946 Section 28

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Hrishikesh Holey

    Adv. D.M. Shrimali

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Divisional Controller, M.S.R.T.C, Amravati and 1 Advocate - V.D. Tayade

Case History

  1. 28-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Hearing on Preliminary Issues

    Judge, Labour Court

  3. 31-Jan-2026

    Hearing on Preliminary Issues

    Judge, Labour Court

  4. 17-Nov-2025

    Hearing on Preliminary Issues

    Judge, Labour Court

  5. 22-Sep-2025

    Hearing on Preliminary Issues

    Judge, Labour Court

  6. 18-Aug-2025

    Hearing on Preliminary Issues

    Judge, Labour Court

  7. 16-Jul-2025

    Hearing on Preliminary Issues

    Judge, Labour Court

  8. 20-Jun-2025

    Hearing on Preliminary Issues

    Judge, Labour Court

  9. 29-Apr-2025

    Hearing on Preliminary Issues

    Judge, Labour Court

  10. 18-Mar-2025

    Hearing on Preliminary Issues

    Judge, Labour Court

  11. 10-Feb-2025

    Hearing on Preliminary Issues

    Judge, Labour Court

  12. 16-Dec-2024

    Hearing on Preliminary Issues

    Judge, Labour Court

  13. 05-Nov-2024

    Hearing on Preliminary Issues

    Judge, Labour Court

  14. 27-Sep-2024

    Hearing on Preliminary Issues

    Judge, Labour Court

  15. 23-Aug-2024

    Hearing on Preliminary Issues

    Judge, Labour Court

  16. 16-Jul-2024

    Hearing on Preliminary Issues

    Judge, Labour Court

  17. 26-Apr-2024

    Hearing on Preliminary Issues

    Judge, Labour Court

  18. 11-Mar-2024

    Hearing on Preliminary Issues

    Judge, Labour Court

  19. 06-Feb-2024

    Hearing on Preliminary Issues

    Judge, Labour Court

  20. 22-Dec-2023

    Hearing on Preliminary Issues

    Judge, Labour Court

  21. 24-Nov-2023

    Hearing on Preliminary Issues

    Judge, Labour Court

  22. 25-Oct-2023

    Hearing on Preliminary Issues

    Judge, Labour Court

  23. 05-Sep-2023

    Hearing on Preliminary Issues

    Judge, Labour Court

  24. 01-Aug-2023

    Hearing on Preliminary Issues

    Judge, Labour Court

  25. 13-Jul-2023

    Issues

    Judge, Labour Court

  26. 18-Apr-2023

    R P Sent

    Judge, Labour Court

  27. 06-Feb-2023

    R P Sent

    Judge, Labour Court

  28. 23-Nov-2022

    R P Sent

    Judge, Labour Court

  29. 17-Sep-2022

    R P Sent

    Judge, Labour Court

  30. 28-Jul-2022

    R P Sent

    Judge, Labour Court

  31. 17-May-2022

    R P Sent

    Judge, Labour Court

  32. 09-Mar-2022

    R P Sent

    Judge, Labour Court

  33. 12-Jan-2022

    R P Sent

    Judge, Labour Court

  34. 16-Nov-2021

    R P Sent

    Judge, Labour Court

  35. 20-Sep-2021

    R P Sent

    Judge, Labour Court

  36. 20-Jul-2021

    R P Sent

    Judge, Labour Court

  37. 12-May-2021

    R P Sent

    Judge, Labour Court

  38. 23-Mar-2021

    R P Sent

    Judge, Labour Court

  39. 10-Feb-2021

    R P Sent

    Judge, Labour Court

  40. 14-Dec-2020

    R P Sent

    Judge, Labour Court

  41. 15-Oct-2020

    R P Sent

    Judge, Labour Court

  42. 29-Jul-2020

    R P Sent

    Judge, Labour Court

  43. 19-May-2020

    R P Sent

    Judge, Labour Court

  44. 06-Mar-2020

    R P Sent

    Judge, Labour Court

  45. 07-Jan-2020

    R P Sent

    Judge, Labour Court

  46. 06-Nov-2019

    R P Sent

    Judge, Labour Court

  47. 11-Sep-2019

    R P Sent

    Judge, Labour Court

  48. 03-Jul-2019

    R P Sent

    Judge, Labour Court

  49. 09-Apr-2019

    R P Sent

    Judge, Labour Court

  50. 10-Jan-2019

    R P Sent

    Judge, Labour Court

  51. 13-Nov-2018

    Issues

    Judge, Labour Court

  52. 07-Sep-2018

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary Complaint (ULP) No. 13 of 2018 | Labour Court, Amravati The Labour Court allowed the application and stayed the show cause notice of dismissal dated 20.2.2018 issued to Hrishikesh Gajanan Holey by Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation until final disposal of the main complaint. The court found that the dismissal notice was based on a cancelled circular (No. 32/17), issued without conducting any inquiry or providing the employee an opportunity to be heard, thereby violating principles of natural justice. The complainant demonstrated a prima facie case with balance of convenience in his favour. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  53. 07-Sep-2018

    Documents

    Judge, Labour Court

  54. 06-Sep-2018

    Order

    Judge, Labour Court

  55. 30-Aug-2018

    Order

    Judge, Labour Court

  56. 23-Aug-2018

    Order

    Judge, Labour Court

  57. 18-Aug-2018

    Order

    Judge, Labour Court

  58. 14-Aug-2018

    Order

    Judge, Labour Court

  59. 10-Aug-2018

    Order

    Judge, Labour Court

  60. 04-Aug-2018

    Order

    Judge, Labour Court

  61. 24-Jul-2018

    Reply

    Judge, Labour Court

  62. 13-Jul-2018

    Reply

    Judge, Labour Court

  63. 12-Jun-2018

    Reply

    Judge, Labour Court

  64. 24-Apr-2018

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  65. 24-Apr-2018

    Case filed

    Registration No. 13/2018

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Complaint (ULP) No. 13 of 2018 | Labour Court, Amravati The Labour Court allowed the application and stayed the show cause notice of dismissal dated 20.2.2018 issued to Hrishikesh Gajanan Holey by Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation until final disposal of the main complaint. The court found that the dismissal notice was based on a cancelled circular (No. 32/17), issued without conducting any inquiry or providing the employee an opportunity to be heard, thereby violating principles of natural justice. The complainant demonstrated a prima facie case with balance of convenience in his favour. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case