Ashok Ganpat Popalghat vs The Chief Engineer, Transmission Zone Office Pareshan, MSETC Ltd. — 24/2018
Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 33. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 02nd April 2026.
Appln IDA - Application
CNR: MHLC200027492016
Next Hearing
02nd April 2026
Filing Number
1260/2018
Filing Date
27-04-2018
Registration No
24/2018
Registration Date
08-05-2018
Court
Labour Court, Aurangabad
Judge
1-JUDGE, 1st LABOUR COURT, AURANGABAD.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ashok Ganpat Popalghat
Adv. VIDWAUNS SAGAR SUDHIR
Respondent(s)
The Chief Engineer, Transmission Zone Office Pareshan, MSETC Ltd.
The Managing Director, Human Resource, MSETC Ltd.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-JUDGE, 1st LABOUR COURT, AURANGABAD.
Evidence
Cross Examination
Cross Examination
Cross Examination
Cross Examination
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 18-02-2026 | Cross Examination |
| 09-02-2026 | Cross Examination |
| 07-02-2026 | Cross Examination |
| 22-01-2026 | Cross Examination |
Interim Orders
Summary The Labor Court (IDA Application 24 of 2018) allowed the petition in full. The court rejected the applicant's claim for overtime allowance beyond 75 hours, holding that the responsibility for granting such overtime rests with the administration, not the employee, and that requesting overtime payment is the administration's discretion. The court found no grounds to compel the payment of overtime allowance exceeding 75 hours. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Labor Court (IDA Application 24 of 2018) allowed the petition in full. The court rejected the applicant's claim for overtime allowance beyond 75 hours, holding that the responsibility for granting such overtime rests with the administration, not the employee, and that requesting overtime payment is the administration's discretion. The court found no grounds to compel the payment of overtime allowance exceeding 75 hours. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts