Bapu Ashok Gavali vs The M.S.R.T.C. Corporation Thorugh its Dvisional Controller Advocate - MALODE SEEMA PURUSHOTTAM — 1800053/2015
Case under Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 Section 2830. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 06th April 2026.
Comp ULP - Complaint
CNR: MHLC200004862015
Next Hearing
06th April 2026
Filing Number
1800509/2015
Filing Date
02-11-2015
Registration No
1800053/2015
Registration Date
02-11-2015
Court
Labour Court, Aurangabad
Judge
1-JUDGE, 1st LABOUR COURT, AURANGABAD.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Bapu Ashok Gavali
Adv. SURWASE ANIL NIVRATTIRAO
Divisional Traffic Superintendent, M.S.R.T.C. Aurangabad.
Adv. DHOBALE SATISH PRABHAKAR
Respondent(s)
The M.S.R.T.C. Corporation Thorugh its Dvisional Controller Advocate - MALODE SEEMA PURUSHOTTAM
Hearing History
Judge: 1-JUDGE, 1st LABOUR COURT, AURANGABAD.
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Cross Examination
Notice
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 24-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 06-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 25-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 10-02-2026 | Cross Examination |
| 19-01-2026 | Notice |
Interim Orders
SUMMARY The petition is allowed in full. The court directed the vehicle owner to pay Rs. 1,325/- to the witness, finding that the respondent (Department) failed to provide proper authorization letters for the witness examination and made errors in ticket documentation (Ticket No. 4373). The court rejected the Department's defense regarding the traffic violation and ordered no relief for the respondent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY The petition is allowed in full. The court directed the vehicle owner to pay Rs. 1,325/- to the witness, finding that the respondent (Department) failed to provide proper authorization letters for the witness examination and made errors in ticket documentation (Ticket No. 4373). The court rejected the Department's defense regarding the traffic violation and ordered no relief for the respondent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts