Khandu Bala Mate vs Managing Director, Deogiri Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Lt and another Advocate - SURYAWANSHI KAMLAKAR JALINDHAR — 71/2021

Case under Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 Section 4. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED IN DEFAULT on 06th March 2026.

Case disposed

Appln PGA

CNR: MHLC200004562021

Filing Number

732/2021

Filing Date

07-Dec-2021

Registration No

71/2021

Registration Date

08-Dec-2021

Court

Labour Court, Aurangabad

Judge

1-Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

Decision Date

06-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED IN DEFAULT

Last updated 26-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 Section 4

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Khandu Bala Mate

    Adv. BANKAR KUNAL AMRUTRAO

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Managing Director, Deogiri Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Lt and another Advocate - SURYAWANSHI KAMLAKAR JALINDHAR

  2. 2.The Liquidator, Deogiri Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Lt.

    Adv. SURYAWANSHI KAMLAKAR JALINDHAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  3. 21-Feb-2026

    Dismissal Order

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  4. 12-Feb-2026

    Order

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  5. 17-Jan-2026

    Order

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  6. 07-Jan-2026

    Order

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  7. 23-Dec-2025

    Order

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  8. 10-Dec-2025

    Order

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  9. 27-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  10. 18-Nov-2025

    Order

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  11. 12-Nov-2025

    Order

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  12. 30-Oct-2025

    Order

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  13. 04-Oct-2025

    Steps

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  14. 24-Sep-2025

    Steps

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  15. 11-Sep-2025

    Copy of Order Below ExhibitView PDF

    The Labour Court, Aurangabad set aside the "no written statement" (no WS) order dated 24/03/2022, allowing the respondent to file their written statement on merit. However, the court imposed a cost of Rs. 500/- as a penalty for the delay in appointing an advocate, finding it just to permit the case to proceed on merits while penalizing the unjustified delay. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  16. 11-Sep-2025

    Steps

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  17. 28-Aug-2025

    Order on Exh._________

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  18. 11-Aug-2025

    Order on Exh._________

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  19. 23-Jul-2025

    Aurgu. on Exh.

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  20. 05-Jul-2025

    Say

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  21. 22-May-2025

    Say

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  22. 11-Apr-2025

    Say

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  23. 03-Mar-2025

    Say

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  24. 23-Jan-2025

    Say

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  25. 13-Dec-2024

    Say

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  26. 08-Nov-2024

    Say

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  27. 28-Sep-2024

    Say

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  28. 23-Aug-2024

    Say

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  29. 27-Jul-2024

    Say

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  30. 16-Jul-2024

    Say

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  31. 12-Jul-2024

    Say

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  32. 12-Jun-2024

    Say

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  33. 18-Apr-2024

    Say

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  34. 15-Mar-2024

    Say

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  35. 03-Mar-2024

    Say

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  36. 23-Feb-2024

    Settlement

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  37. 31-Jan-2024

    Say

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  38. 04-Jan-2024

    Say

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  39. 28-Nov-2023

    Say

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  40. 13-Oct-2023

    Say

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  41. 04-Sep-2023

    Say

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  42. 25-Jul-2023

    Say

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  43. 16-Jun-2023

    Say

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  44. 12-Apr-2023

    Say

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  45. 18-Mar-2023

    Say

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  46. 07-Feb-2023

    Say

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  47. 04-Jan-2023

    Say

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  48. 28-Nov-2022

    Say

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  49. 01-Nov-2022

    Say

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  50. 29-Sep-2022

    Say

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  51. 01-Sep-2022

    Say

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  52. 02-Aug-2022

    Say

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  53. 04-Jul-2022

    Say

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  54. 09-Jun-2022

    Say

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  55. 17-May-2022

    Say

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  56. 27-Apr-2022

    Say

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  57. 24-Mar-2022

    Ex-parte Evidence

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  58. 21-Feb-2022

    Appearance

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  59. 18-Jan-2022

    Appearance

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  60. 18-Dec-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  61. 07-Dec-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. 71/2021

casestatus.in Summary

The Labour Court, Aurangabad set aside the "no written statement" (no WS) order dated 24/03/2022, allowing the respondent to file their written statement on merit. However, the court imposed a cost of Rs. 500/- as a penalty for the delay in appointing an advocate, finding it just to permit the case to proceed on merits while penalizing the unjustified delay. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case