Laxman Balwanta Jogdand vs Managing Director, Deogiri Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Lt and other 1 Advocate - SURYAWANSHI KAMLAKAR JALINDHAR — 65/2021
Case under Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 Section 4. Status: Settlement. Next hearing: 13th May 2026.
Appln PGA
CNR: MHLC200004362021
Next Hearing
13th May 2026
Filing Number
704/2021
Filing Date
22-11-2021
Registration No
65/2021
Registration Date
23-11-2021
Court
Labour Court, Aurangabad
Judge
1-JUDGE, 1st LABOUR COURT, AURANGABAD.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Laxman Balwanta Jogdand
Adv. BANKAR KUNAL AMRUTRAO
Respondent(s)
Managing Director, Deogiri Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Lt and other 1 Advocate - SURYAWANSHI KAMLAKAR JALINDHAR
The Liquidator, Deogiri Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Lt.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-JUDGE, 1st LABOUR COURT, AURANGABAD.
Settlement
Settlement
Settlement
Settlement
Settlement
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Settlement |
| 06-03-2026 | Settlement |
| 12-02-2026 | Settlement |
| 29-01-2026 | Settlement |
| 16-01-2026 | Settlement |
Interim Orders
Summary The respondent's application for dismissal of a gratuity claim under Section 107 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 has been rejected. The court held that since the applicant's claim concerns gratuity under the Payment of Gratuity Act and not the winding-up or dissolution process itself, prior permission from the Registrar is not required. The gratuity application can proceed on merit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The respondent's application for dismissal of a gratuity claim under Section 107 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 has been rejected. The court held that since the applicant's claim concerns gratuity under the Payment of Gratuity Act and not the winding-up or dissolution process itself, prior permission from the Registrar is not required. The gratuity application can proceed on merit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts