Pandit Totaram Vispute vs The General Manager,Maharashtra Gramin Bank, Aurangabad Advocate - SHAHANE PRADEEP LAXMANRAO — 45/2018
Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 10. Status: Cross Examination. Next hearing: 04th April 2026.
Ref-IDA - Reference
CNR: MHLC200003252018
Next Hearing
04th April 2026
Filing Number
1808/2018
Filing Date
25-09-2018
Registration No
45/2018
Registration Date
25-09-2018
Court
Labour Court, Aurangabad
Judge
1-JUDGE, 1st LABOUR COURT, AURANGABAD.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Pandit Totaram Vispute
Adv. KAWARE BAPUSASAHEB RGHUNATH
Respondent(s)
The General Manager,Maharashtra Gramin Bank, Aurangabad Advocate - SHAHANE PRADEEP LAXMANRAO
Hearing History
Judge: 1-JUDGE, 1st LABOUR COURT, AURANGABAD.
Cross Examination
Respondents Evidence
Respondents Evidence
Respondents Evidence
Cross Examination
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | Cross Examination |
| 06-03-2026 | Respondents Evidence |
| 21-02-2026 | Respondents Evidence |
| 31-01-2026 | Respondents Evidence |
| 20-01-2026 | Cross Examination |
Interim Orders
Summary: This is an Industrial Dispute Appeal (IDA 45/2018) order from the Labour Court, Aurangabad, dated 31/01/2026. The appeal is allowed in full ("संपूर्ण") with no relief granted to the respondent. The court found in favor of the appellant regarding disputes concerning Maharashtra Gramin Bank's organizational structure, management board composition, and related procedural matters, while rejecting the respondent's contentions on documentary evidence and statutory compliance issues. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: This is an Industrial Dispute Appeal (IDA 45/2018) order from the Labour Court, Aurangabad, dated 31/01/2026. The appeal is allowed in full ("संपूर्ण") with no relief granted to the respondent. The court found in favor of the appellant regarding disputes concerning Maharashtra Gramin Bank's organizational structure, management board composition, and related procedural matters, while rejecting the respondent's contentions on documentary evidence and statutory compliance issues. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts