Gorakhnath Eknath Muley vs The Chairman, Shri Sant Eknath Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Pvt. Ltd. Advocate - DANKH SACHIN VASANTRAO — 44/2021
Case under Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 Section 4and7(1). Status: Say. Next hearing: 04th April 2026.
Appln PGA
CNR: MHLC200003162021
Next Hearing
04th April 2026
Filing Number
546/2021
Filing Date
07-09-2021
Registration No
44/2021
Registration Date
08-09-2021
Court
Labour Court, Aurangabad
Judge
1-JUDGE, 1st LABOUR COURT, AURANGABAD.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Gorakhnath Eknath Muley
Adv. BANKAR KUNAL AMRUTRAO
Respondent(s)
The Chairman, Shri Sant Eknath Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Pvt. Ltd. Advocate - DANKH SACHIN VASANTRAO
Managing Director, Shri Sant Eknath Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd.,
The Chairman, Shri Sant Eknath Sachin Ghayal Sugar Pvt. Ltd.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-JUDGE, 1st LABOUR COURT, AURANGABAD.
Say
Say
Say
Steps
Steps
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Say |
| 12-02-2026 | Say |
| 17-01-2026 | Say |
| 05-01-2026 | Steps |
| 10-12-2025 | Steps |
Interim Orders
Summary: The Labour Court rejected Respondent No. 3's application for dismissal of the gratuity complaint dated 11/09/2025. The court found that while Respondent No. 3 claimed to be wrongly joined as a party, the application lacked supporting documentary evidence and proper authorization, making dismissal unjustified without adjudication of the applicant's gratuity claim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Labour Court rejected Respondent No. 3's application for dismissal of the gratuity complaint dated 11/09/2025. The court found that while Respondent No. 3 claimed to be wrongly joined as a party, the application lacked supporting documentary evidence and proper authorization, making dismissal unjustified without adjudication of the applicant's gratuity claim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts