Kavita Dilip Sawant and others 4 vs Kamlesh Transport Pvt. Ltd. and another Advocate - KAWARE BAPUSASAHEB RGHUNATH — 24/2021
Case under Workmens Compensation Act, 1923 Section 4. Status: Cross Examination. Next hearing: 02nd April 2026.
Appln WCA C - C
CNR: MHLC200002902021
Next Hearing
02nd April 2026
Filing Number
518/2021
Filing Date
21-08-2021
Registration No
24/2021
Registration Date
23-08-2021
Court
Labour Court, Aurangabad
Judge
1-JUDGE, 1st LABOUR COURT, AURANGABAD.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Kavita Dilip Sawant and others 4
Adv. MUNDADA ANIKET VINOD
Dnyeshwari Dilip Sawant
Adv. THITE SUNIL SOPAN
Mahesh Dilip Sawant
Adv. THITE SUNIL SOPAN
Bhagirathi Bhagvan Savant
Adv. THITE SUNIL SOPAN
Bhagvan Bhimaji Sawant
Adv. THITE SUNIL SOPAN
Respondent(s)
Kamlesh Transport Pvt. Ltd. and another Advocate - KAWARE BAPUSASAHEB RGHUNATH
The Branch Manager, Bajaj Allianz General Insurnace Co. Ltd.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-JUDGE, 1st LABOUR COURT, AURANGABAD.
Cross Examination
Cross Examination
Cross Examination
Cross Examination
Cross Examination
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Cross Examination |
| 09-02-2026 | Cross Examination |
| 07-02-2026 | Cross Examination |
| 29-12-2025 | Cross Examination |
| 10-11-2025 | Cross Examination |
Interim Orders
Summary: The Labour Court at Aurangabad allowed the respondent's application for framing a preliminary issue regarding the tenability of the claim petition under Section 53 of the ESI Act. The court designated this issue (Issue No. 1(A)) as a preliminary issue and directed parties to lead evidence on it if desired. The respondent was further ordered to file a copy of the proposal/report submitted to ESIC following the accident in question. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Labour Court at Aurangabad allowed the respondent's application for framing a preliminary issue regarding the tenability of the claim petition under Section 53 of the ESI Act. The court designated this issue (Issue No. 1(A)) as a preliminary issue and directed parties to lead evidence on it if desired. The respondent was further ordered to file a copy of the proposal/report submitted to ESIC following the accident in question. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts