Subhash Rambhau Bhawar vs Manager, Nayantara Chemicals Pvt. Ltd. Advocate - KAWARE BAPUSASAHEB RGHUNATH — 15/2022

Case under Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 Section 28 1 30 2. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 13th April 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 13-Apr-2026 this date has passed

Comp ULP - Complaint

CNR: MHLC200002792022

Filing Number

367/2022

Filing Date

30-Jun-2022

Registration No

15/2022

Registration Date

02-Jul-2022

Court

Labour Court, Aurangabad

Judge

1-Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

Last updated 26-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 Section 28 1 30 2

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Subhash Rambhau Bhawar

    Adv. Salunke P.B.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Manager, Nayantara Chemicals Pvt. Ltd. Advocate - KAWARE BAPUSASAHEB RGHUNATH

Case History

  1. 13-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  3. 06-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Judge, 2nd Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  4. 07-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Judge, 2nd Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  5. 11-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Judge, 2nd Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  6. 29-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Judge, 2nd Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  7. 16-Oct-2025

    Issues

    Judge, 2nd Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  8. 26-Aug-2025

    Issues

    Judge, 2nd Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  9. 19-Jul-2025

    Issues

    Judge, 2nd Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  10. 17-Jun-2025

    Issues

    Judge, 2nd Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  11. 21-Apr-2025

    Issues

    Judge, 2nd Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  12. 17-Mar-2025

    Issues

    Judge, 2nd Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  13. 05-Feb-2025

    Copy of Order Below ExhibitView PDF

  14. 05-Feb-2025

    Copy of Order Below ExhibitView PDF

    Summary The Labour Court-II at Aurangabad rejected the interim relief application filed by Subhash S/o. Rambhau Bhawar on 05 February 2025. The complainant, who was orally terminated on 02.04.2022 after a shoulder fracture injury, sought reinstatement or 75% monthly salary pending final disposal of his unfair labour practice complaint. The court found the complainant failed to establish a prima facie case, held that balance of convenience did not favor him, and noted that back-wages if granted on merit would compensate any loss, making interim reinstatement unnecessary at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  15. 05-Feb-2025

    Issues

    Judge, 2nd Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  16. 26-Dec-2024

    Order on Exh._________

    Judge, 2nd Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  17. 07-Dec-2024

    Order on Exh._________

    Judge, 2nd Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  18. 14-Nov-2024

    Order on Exh._________

    Judge, 2nd Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  19. 23-Oct-2024

    Order on Exh._________

    Judge, 2nd Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  20. 16-Oct-2024

    Order

    Judge, 2nd Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  21. 23-Sep-2024

    Hearing

    Judge, 2nd Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  22. 13-Aug-2024

    Hearing

    Judge, 2nd Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  23. 31-Jul-2024

    R .and P Sent

    Judge, 2nd Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  24. 18-Jun-2024

    R .and P Sent

    Judge, 2nd Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  25. 29-Apr-2024

    Compliance

    Judge, 2nd Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  26. 18-Mar-2024

    Compliance

    Judge, 2nd Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  27. 13-Feb-2024

    Compliance

    Judge, 2nd Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  28. 05-Jan-2024

    Copy of Order Below ExhibitView PDF

  29. 05-Jan-2024

    Issues

    Judge, 2nd Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  30. 07-Dec-2023

    Order on Exh._________

    Judge, 2nd Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  31. 31-Oct-2023

    Say

    Judge, 2nd Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  32. 26-Oct-2023

    Say

    Judge, 2nd Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  33. 20-Oct-2023

    Interim Order

    Judge, 2nd Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  34. 30-Sep-2023

    Say

    Judge, 2nd Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  35. 25-Sep-2023

    Hearing on Interim Relief

    Judge, 2nd Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  36. 20-Sep-2023

    Hearing on Interim Relief

    Judge, 2nd Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  37. 22-Aug-2023

    Mediation

    Judge, 2nd Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  38. 09-Aug-2023

    Mediation

    Judge, 2nd Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  39. 03-Jul-2023

    Mediation

    Judge, 2nd Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  40. 12-Jun-2023

    Mediation

    Judge, 2nd Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  41. 17-May-2023

    Mediation

    Judge, 2nd Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  42. 12-Apr-2023

    Mediation

    Judge, 2nd Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  43. 24-Mar-2023

    Mediation

    Judge, 2nd Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  44. 17-Feb-2023

    Hearing on Interim Relief

    Judge, 2nd Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  45. 12-Jan-2023

    Hearing on Interim Relief

    Judge, 2nd Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  46. 14-Dec-2022

    Hearing on Interim Relief

    Judge, 2nd Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  47. 16-Nov-2022

    Written Statement

    Judge, 2nd Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  48. 06-Oct-2022

    Written Statement

    Judge, 2nd Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  49. 29-Aug-2022

    Written Statement

    Judge, 2nd Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  50. 06-Aug-2022

    Report

    Judge, 2nd Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  51. 11-Jul-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  52. 30-Jun-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 15/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Labour Court-II at Aurangabad rejected the interim relief application filed by Subhash S/o. Rambhau Bhawar on 05 February 2025. The complainant, who was orally terminated on 02.04.2022 after a shoulder fracture injury, sought reinstatement or 75% monthly salary pending final disposal of his unfair labour practice complaint. The court found the complainant failed to establish a prima facie case, held that balance of convenience did not favor him, and noted that back-wages if granted on merit would compensate any loss, making interim reinstatement unnecessary at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case