Abasaheb Machhindra Salunke vs M/s. Indus Towers Ltd. Thr. Its Manager Advocate - THOLE YTIN INDARCHANDRA — 1/2024
Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 33A. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 09th April 2026.
Complaint (IT)
CNR: MHLC200002532024
Next Hearing
09th April 2026
e-Filing Number
11-06-2024
Filing Number
310/2024
Filing Date
14-06-2024
Registration No
1/2024
Registration Date
14-06-2024
Court
Labour Court, Aurangabad
Judge
1-JUDGE, 1st LABOUR COURT, AURANGABAD.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Abasaheb Machhindra Salunke
Adv. B.S. Shinde
Indus Mobile Tower Technical Karmachari Sanghatna Thr. Its President
Respondent(s)
M/s. Indus Towers Ltd. Thr. Its Manager Advocate - THOLE YTIN INDARCHANDRA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-JUDGE, 1st LABOUR COURT, AURANGABAD.
Evidence
Evidence
Cross Examination
Cross Examination
Cross Examination
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 24-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 06-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 05-03-2026 | Cross Examination |
| 16-02-2026 | Cross Examination |
| 04-02-2026 | Cross Examination |
Interim Orders
Summary: In this Labour Court case (Takarar Aayti No. 1/2024, Aurangabad), the court rejected the petitioner's claims regarding employer-employee relationship with the Industrial Tower and Team Lizard. The court found no valid employment contract and dismissed the petition on the grounds that the petitioner failed to establish the requisite employer-employee relationship. The order was passed on 07/08/2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In this Labour Court case (Takarar Aayti No. 1/2024, Aurangabad), the court rejected the petitioner's claims regarding employer-employee relationship with the Industrial Tower and Team Lizard. The court found no valid employment contract and dismissed the petition on the grounds that the petitioner failed to establish the requisite employer-employee relationship. The order was passed on 07/08/2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts