Satyanarayan Bharat Gurkhude vs The Divisional Controller Advocate - SHAIKH ABDUL KAYUM — 35/2025

Case under Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 Section 28AND30. Status: Issues. Next hearing: 27th April 2026.

Issues Next hearing 27-Apr-2026 this date has passed

Comp ULP - Complaint

CNR: MHLC200002092025

e-Filing Number

15-07-2025

Filing Number

362/2025

Filing Date

15-Jul-2025

Registration No

35/2025

Registration Date

15-Jul-2025

Court

Labour Court, Aurangabad

Judge

1-Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

Last updated 26-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 Section 28AND30

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Satyanarayan Bharat Gurkhude

    Adv. SURWASE ANIL NIVRATTIRAO

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Divisional Controller Advocate - SHAIKH ABDUL KAYUM

  2. 2.The Assistant Mechanical Engineer

Case History

  1. 27-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Issues

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  3. 18-Feb-2026

    Issues

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  4. 16-Jan-2026

    Issues

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  5. 15-Jan-2026

    Issues

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  6. 18-Dec-2025

    Issues

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  7. 14-Nov-2025

    Written Statement

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  8. 31-Oct-2025

    Copy of Order Below ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary The Labour Court-1 at Aurangabad partly allowed the interim relief application filed by Satyanarayan Bharat Gurkhude against MSRTC and others. The court stayed the operation and execution of the dismissal show-cause notice dated 08/07/2025, directing the respondent not to dismiss the complainant during the pendency of the complaint. The judge found that the respondent prima facie committed unfair labor practice by proposing dismissal for absenteeism without establishing willfulness, and that the absence was justified due to the complainant's medical treatment for a spine injury. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  9. 31-Oct-2025

    Written Statement

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  10. 16-Oct-2025

    Interim Order

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  11. 01-Oct-2025

    Interim Order

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  12. 24-Sep-2025

    Hearing on Interim Relief

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  13. 20-Sep-2025

    Hearing on Interim Relief

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  14. 08-Sep-2025

    Hearing on Interim Relief

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  15. 18-Aug-2025

    Hearing on Interim Relief

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  16. 04-Aug-2025

    Hearing on Interim Relief

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  17. 16-Jul-2025

    Copy of Order Below ExhibitView PDF

  18. 16-Jul-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  19. 15-Jul-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 35/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The Labour Court-1 at Aurangabad partly allowed the interim relief application filed by Satyanarayan Bharat Gurkhude against MSRTC and others. The court stayed the operation and execution of the dismissal show-cause notice dated 08/07/2025, directing the respondent not to dismiss the complainant during the pendency of the complaint. The judge found that the respondent prima facie committed unfair labor practice by proposing dismissal for absenteeism without establishing willfulness, and that the absence was justified due to the complainant's medical treatment for a spine injury. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case