Mirabai Sonyabapu Goltakke and others 2 vs Prprietor/Sansthapak, Yash Institute of Pharmacy, Aurangabad and other 1 Advocate - PATIL ASHOK VITTAL — 17/2021
Case under Workmens Compensation Act, 1923 Section o. Status: Issues. Next hearing: 27th March 2026.
Appln WCA C - C
CNR: MHLC200002022021
Next Hearing
27th March 2026
Filing Number
423/2021
Filing Date
02-07-2021
Registration No
17/2021
Registration Date
07-07-2021
Court
Labour Court, Aurangabad
Judge
1-JUDGE, 1st LABOUR COURT, AURANGABAD.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Mirabai Sonyabapu Goltakke and others 2
Adv. TANDULJE PADMAKAR SHANKARAO
Rushikesh Sonyabapu Goltakke
Adv. TANDULJE PADMAKAR SHANKARAO
Bharti Sonyabapu Goltakke
Adv. TANDULJE PADMAKAR SHANKARAO
Respondent(s)
Prprietor/Sansthapak, Yash Institute of Pharmacy, Aurangabad and other 1 Advocate - PATIL ASHOK VITTAL
Principle, Yash Institute of Pharmacy, Aurangabad
Adv. PATIL ASHOK VITTAL
Hearing History
Judge: 1-JUDGE, 1st LABOUR COURT, AURANGABAD.
Issues
Issues
Issues
Issues
Amendment
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Issues |
| 09-02-2026 | Issues |
| 17-01-2026 | Issues |
| 08-01-2026 | Issues |
| 18-12-2025 | Amendment |
Interim Orders
Summary: The application for amendment of pleadings in a Workmen's Compensation Act case was allowed. The applicant sought to amend para 11 and 13 to implead respondents 3 and 4 as contractors and claim compensation of Rs. 25,00,000 based on the death of her husband during employment on 30/06/2020. The court found the amendment justified as it arose from the respondents' own written statements and a partnership agreement filed on record, and that it would not prejudice the respondents' right to defend on merit. The applicant must pay Rs. 500 cost to each respondent before submitting the amended application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The application for amendment of pleadings in a Workmen's Compensation Act case was allowed. The applicant sought to amend para 11 and 13 to implead respondents 3 and 4 as contractors and claim compensation of Rs. 25,00,000 based on the death of her husband during employment on 30/06/2020. The court found the amendment justified as it arose from the respondents' own written statements and a partnership agreement filed on record, and that it would not prejudice the respondents' right to defend on merit. The applicant must pay Rs. 500 cost to each respondent before submitting the amended application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts