Shukantala Ratilal Koli vs Kevalkishan Durgadas Agarwal and others 2 Advocate - ASHOK BHAGADE — 11/2020
Case under Workmens Compensation Act, 1923 Section o. Status: Aurgu. on Exh.. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.
Appln WCA C - C
CNR: MHLC200001742020
Next Hearing
10th April 2026
Filing Number
247/2020
Filing Date
23-07-2020
Registration No
11/2020
Registration Date
30-07-2020
Court
Labour Court, Aurangabad
Judge
1-JUDGE, 1st LABOUR COURT, AURANGABAD.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shukantala Ratilal Koli
Adv. M.A. Bhosle
Respondent(s)
Kevalkishan Durgadas Agarwal and others 2 Advocate - ASHOK BHAGADE
The Branch Manager, HDFC Ergo General Insurance Co.Ltd.
Adv. DESHMUKH MOHIT R
Manish Sant Krishan Agarwal
Adv. Ganesh B. Pimple
Hearing History
Judge: 1-JUDGE, 1st LABOUR COURT, AURANGABAD.
Aurgu. on Exh.
Say
Respondents Evidence
Respondents Evidence
Respondents Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | Aurgu. on Exh. |
| 06-03-2026 | Say |
| 20-02-2026 | Respondents Evidence |
| 10-02-2026 | Respondents Evidence |
| 30-01-2026 | Respondents Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary: The appeal (WCA C 11/2020) filed by Respondent No. 1 is completely allowed (संपूर्ण), and the case is remitted to the Labor Court No. 1, Aurangabad for further proceedings on the merits within the stipulated timeframe. The court found that the affidavit filed by Respondent No. 1 contained credible evidence regarding family circumstances, police investigation details, and business matters that warranted reconsideration of the case on its substantive merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The appeal (WCA C 11/2020) filed by Respondent No. 1 is completely allowed (संपूर्ण), and the case is remitted to the Labor Court No. 1, Aurangabad for further proceedings on the merits within the stipulated timeframe. The court found that the affidavit filed by Respondent No. 1 contained credible evidence regarding family circumstances, police investigation details, and business matters that warranted reconsideration of the case on its substantive merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts