Dilbaug Pyarelal Ridlawn vs The Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Aurangabad Advocate - MULE RAJARAM BALKRISHNA — 19/2020

Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 33C2. Status: Order. Next hearing: 27th March 2026.

Order Next hearing 27-Mar-2026 this date has passed

Appln IDA - Application

CNR: MHLC200001582020

Filing Number

201/2020

Filing Date

21-Mar-2020

Registration No

19/2020

Registration Date

06-Apr-2020

Court

Labour Court, Aurangabad

Judge

1-Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

Last updated 26-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 33C2

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Dilbaug Pyarelal Ridlawn

    Adv. WAIKOS AMIT BABARAO

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Aurangabad Advocate - MULE RAJARAM BALKRISHNA

  2. 2.Maharana Agency Security and Labour Supplier Services Aurangabad

Case History

  1. 27-Mar-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Order

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  3. 18-Feb-2026

    Order

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  4. 12-Feb-2026

    Order

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  5. 17-Jan-2026

    Order

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  6. 06-Jan-2026

    Order

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  7. 15-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  8. 21-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  9. 07-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  10. 15-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  11. 22-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  12. 03-Sep-2025

    Issues

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  13. 08-Aug-2025

    Copy of Order Below ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary Application IDA No. 19/2020 | Labour Court No. 1, Aurangabad The application filed by Dilbaug Pyarelal Ridlawn seeking wage difference of Rs. 1,39,150 against the Municipal Corporation of Aurangabad under Section 33-C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 has been dismissed as not maintainable. The court held that since the employer-employee relationship itself is a disputed fact and there is no prior adjudication establishing this relationship, the Labour Court lacks jurisdiction to entertain wage difference claims under Section 33-C(2). The applicant must first initiate appropriate proceedings by way of industrial dispute reference to establish his employment status before pursuing wage claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  14. 08-Aug-2025

    Issues

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  15. 01-Aug-2025

    Order

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  16. 23-Jul-2025

    Citation

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  17. 17-Jul-2025

    Citation

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  18. 07-Jul-2025

    Order

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  19. 19-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  20. 10-Jun-2025

    Aurgu. on Exh.

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  21. 05-May-2025

    Order on Exh._________

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  22. 16-Apr-2025

    Order on Exh._________

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  23. 12-Mar-2025

    Order on Exh._________

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  24. 06-Feb-2025

    Order on Exh._________

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  25. 09-Jan-2025

    Order on Exh._________

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  26. 18-Nov-2024

    Say

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  27. 07-Oct-2024

    Say

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  28. 18-Sep-2024

    Say

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  29. 07-Aug-2024

    Say

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  30. 10-Jul-2024

    Say

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  31. 13-Jun-2024

    Say

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  32. 22-Apr-2024

    Say

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  33. 13-Mar-2024

    Say

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  34. 12-Feb-2024

    Evidence

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  35. 11-Jan-2024

    Evidence

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  36. 14-Dec-2023

    Evidence

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  37. 22-Nov-2023

    Evidence

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  38. 16-Oct-2023

    Evidence

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  39. 06-Sep-2023

    Copy of EvidenceView PDF

  40. 06-Sep-2023

    Evidence

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  41. 03-Aug-2023

    Cross Examination

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  42. 22-Jun-2023

    Cross Examination

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  43. 26-Apr-2023

    Evidence

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  44. 10-Mar-2023

    Evidence

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  45. 20-Jan-2023

    Evidence

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  46. 19-Dec-2022

    Evidence

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  47. 16-Nov-2022

    Evidence

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  48. 10-Oct-2022

    Evidence

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  49. 12-Sep-2022

    Evidence

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  50. 08-Aug-2022

    Evidence

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  51. 06-Jul-2022

    Evidence

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  52. 06-Jun-2022

    Issues

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  53. 11-Apr-2022

    Issues

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  54. 03-Mar-2022

    Issues

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  55. 31-Jan-2022

    Appearance

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  56. 03-Jan-2022

    Appearance

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  57. 29-Nov-2021

    Written Statement

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  58. 20-Oct-2021

    Written Statement

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  59. 18-Oct-2021

    Written Statement

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  60. 08-Sep-2021

    Written Statement

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  61. 11-Aug-2021

    Written Statement

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  62. 16-Jul-2021

    Written Statement

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  63. 25-Jun-2021

    Written Statement

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  64. 19-May-2021

    Written Statement

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  65. 16-Apr-2021

    Written Statement

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  66. 12-Mar-2021

    Written Statement

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  67. 16-Feb-2021

    Written Statement

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  68. 22-Jan-2021

    Written Statement

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  69. 19-Dec-2020

    Written Statement

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  70. 24-Nov-2020

    Written Statement

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  71. 22-Oct-2020

    Appearance

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  72. 25-Sep-2020

    Appearance

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  73. 29-Aug-2020

    Notice

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  74. 03-Aug-2020

    Notice

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  75. 08-Jul-2020

    Notice

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  76. 11-Jun-2020

    Notice

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  77. 15-May-2020

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  78. 21-Mar-2020

    Case filed

    Registration No. 19/2020

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Application IDA No. 19/2020 | Labour Court No. 1, Aurangabad The application filed by Dilbaug Pyarelal Ridlawn seeking wage difference of Rs. 1,39,150 against the Municipal Corporation of Aurangabad under Section 33-C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 has been dismissed as not maintainable. The court held that since the employer-employee relationship itself is a disputed fact and there is no prior adjudication establishing this relationship, the Labour Court lacks jurisdiction to entertain wage difference claims under Section 33-C(2). The applicant must first initiate appropriate proceedings by way of industrial dispute reference to establish his employment status before pursuing wage claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case