Santosh Sukhdev Borde vs The Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Aurangabad Advocate - MULE RAJARAM BALKRISHNA — 18/2020

Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 33C2. Status: Order. Next hearing: 27th March 2026.

Order Next hearing 27-Mar-2026 this date has passed

Appln IDA - Application

CNR: MHLC200001572020

Filing Number

200/2020

Filing Date

21-Mar-2020

Registration No

18/2020

Registration Date

06-Apr-2020

Court

Labour Court, Aurangabad

Judge

1-Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

Last updated 26-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 33C2

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Santosh Sukhdev Borde

    Adv. WAIKOS AMIT BABARAO

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Aurangabad Advocate - MULE RAJARAM BALKRISHNA

  2. 2.Maharana Agency Security and Labour Supplier Services Aurangabad

Case History

  1. 27-Mar-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Order

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  3. 18-Feb-2026

    Order

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  4. 12-Feb-2026

    Order

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  5. 17-Jan-2026

    Order

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  6. 06-Jan-2026

    Order

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  7. 15-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  8. 21-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  9. 07-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  10. 15-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  11. 22-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  12. 03-Sep-2025

    Issues

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  13. 08-Aug-2025

    Copy of Order Below ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary The Labour Court dismissed an application filed by Santosh Sukhdev Borde under Section 33-C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, against the Municipal Corporation of Aurangabad, finding it not maintainable. The court held that since the employer-employee relationship between the applicant and the corporation was a disputed fact with no prior adjudication, the Labour Court lacked jurisdiction to determine wage differences—which requires pre-existing benefits to be established first. The applicant was directed to pursue appropriate proceedings through industrial dispute reference to establish his employment status before seeking wage computation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  14. 08-Aug-2025

    Issues

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  15. 01-Aug-2025

    Order

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  16. 23-Jul-2025

    Citation

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  17. 17-Jul-2025

    Citation

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  18. 07-Jul-2025

    Order

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  19. 19-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  20. 10-Jun-2025

    Aurgu. on Exh.

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  21. 05-May-2025

    Order on Exh._________

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  22. 16-Apr-2025

    Order on Exh._________

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  23. 12-Mar-2025

    Order on Exh._________

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  24. 06-Feb-2025

    Order on Exh._________

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  25. 09-Jan-2025

    Order on Exh._________

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  26. 18-Nov-2024

    Say

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  27. 07-Oct-2024

    Say

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  28. 18-Sep-2024

    Say

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  29. 07-Aug-2024

    Say

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  30. 10-Jul-2024

    Say

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  31. 13-Jun-2024

    Say

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  32. 22-Apr-2024

    Say

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  33. 13-Mar-2024

    Say

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  34. 12-Feb-2024

    Evidence

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  35. 11-Jan-2024

    Evidence

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  36. 14-Dec-2023

    Evidence

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  37. 22-Nov-2023

    Cross Examination

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  38. 16-Oct-2023

    Cross Examination

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  39. 06-Sep-2023

    Copy of EvidenceView PDF

  40. 06-Sep-2023

    Cross Examination

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  41. 03-Aug-2023

    Cross Examination

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  42. 22-Jun-2023

    Cross Examination

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  43. 26-Apr-2023

    Evidence

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  44. 10-Mar-2023

    Evidence

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  45. 20-Jan-2023

    Evidence

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  46. 19-Dec-2022

    Evidence

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  47. 16-Nov-2022

    Evidence

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  48. 10-Oct-2022

    Evidence

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  49. 12-Sep-2022

    Evidence

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  50. 08-Aug-2022

    Evidence

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  51. 06-Jul-2022

    Copy of Order Below ExhibitView PDF

  52. 06-Jul-2022

    Evidence

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  53. 06-Jun-2022

    Issues

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  54. 11-Apr-2022

    Issues

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  55. 03-Mar-2022

    Issues

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  56. 31-Jan-2022

    Appearance

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  57. 03-Jan-2022

    Appearance

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  58. 29-Nov-2021

    Written Statement

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  59. 20-Oct-2021

    Written Statement

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  60. 18-Oct-2021

    Written Statement

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  61. 08-Sep-2021

    Written Statement

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  62. 11-Aug-2021

    Written Statement

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  63. 16-Jul-2021

    Written Statement

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  64. 25-Jun-2021

    Written Statement

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  65. 19-May-2021

    Written Statement

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  66. 16-Apr-2021

    Written Statement

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  67. 12-Mar-2021

    Written Statement

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  68. 16-Feb-2021

    Written Statement

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  69. 22-Jan-2021

    Written Statement

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  70. 19-Dec-2020

    Written Statement

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  71. 24-Nov-2020

    Written Statement

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  72. 22-Oct-2020

    Appearance

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  73. 25-Sep-2020

    Appearance

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  74. 29-Aug-2020

    Notice

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  75. 03-Aug-2020

    Notice

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  76. 08-Jul-2020

    Notice

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  77. 11-Jun-2020

    Notice

    Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.

  78. 15-May-2020

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  79. 21-Mar-2020

    Case filed

    Registration No. 18/2020

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The Labour Court dismissed an application filed by Santosh Sukhdev Borde under Section 33-C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, against the Municipal Corporation of Aurangabad, finding it not maintainable. The court held that since the employer-employee relationship between the applicant and the corporation was a disputed fact with no prior adjudication, the Labour Court lacked jurisdiction to determine wage differences—which requires pre-existing benefits to be established first. The applicant was directed to pursue appropriate proceedings through industrial dispute reference to establish his employment status before seeking wage computation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case