Babasaheb Hiraman Khotkar vs The Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Aurangabad Advocate - MULE RAJARAM BALKRISHNA — 17/2020
Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 33C2. Status: Order. Next hearing: 27th March 2026.
Appln IDA - Application
CNR: MHLC200001562020
Next Hearing
27th March 2026
Filing Number
199/2020
Filing Date
21-03-2020
Registration No
17/2020
Registration Date
06-04-2020
Court
Labour Court, Aurangabad
Judge
1-JUDGE, 1st LABOUR COURT, AURANGABAD.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Babasaheb Hiraman Khotkar
Adv. WAIKOS AMIT BABARAO
Respondent(s)
The Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Aurangabad Advocate - MULE RAJARAM BALKRISHNA
Maharana Agency Security and Labour Supplier Services Aurangabad
Hearing History
Judge: 1-JUDGE, 1st LABOUR COURT, AURANGABAD.
Order
Order
Order
Order
Order
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Order |
| 18-02-2026 | Order |
| 12-02-2026 | Order |
| 17-01-2026 | Order |
| 06-01-2026 | Order |
Interim Orders
The petition before the Labour Court was allowed. The court found that there is no employer-employee relationship between the applicant and respondent, and declared that the applicant is not entitled to any relief regarding the maintenance and framing of employment terms under the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947. The application was disposed of accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The petition before the Labour Court was allowed. The court found that there is no employer-employee relationship between the applicant and respondent, and declared that the applicant is not entitled to any relief regarding the maintenance and framing of employment terms under the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947. The application was disposed of accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts