Bhaskar Kisanrao Dorkhe vs The Manager, Surya Springs Pvt. Ltd Advocate - VIDWAUNS SAGAR SUDHIR — 15/2023
Case under Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 Section 4. Status: Cross Examination. Next hearing: 04th April 2026.
Appln PGA
CNR: MHLC200001012023
Filing Number
134/2023
Filing Date
20-Mar-2023
Registration No
15/2023
Registration Date
20-Mar-2023
Court
Labour Court, Aurangabad
Judge
1-Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.
Last updated 26-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Bhaskar Kisanrao Dorkhe
Adv. KHANKE VISHNU SURENDRA
Respondent(s)
-
1.The Manager, Surya Springs Pvt. Ltd Advocate - VIDWAUNS SAGAR SUDHIR
Case History
-
04-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-Mar-2026
Cross Examination
Judge, 1st Labour Court, Aurangabad.
-
20-Feb-2026
Copy of EvidenceView PDF
Summary In Application PGA 15 of 2023, the Labor Court at Aurangabad rejected the appellant's petition challenging their employment termination. The court found that the appellant failed to produce documentary evidence of authorization to represent the company and determined that the company had no obligation to provide witness statements in support of the appellant's claims. The petition was dismissed as incomplete. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
20-Feb-2026
Cross Examination
Judge, 2nd Labour Court, Aurangabad.
-
16-Jan-2026
Cross Examination
Judge, 2nd Labour Court, Aurangabad.
-
24-Dec-2025
Cross Examination
Judge, 2nd Labour Court, Aurangabad.
-
11-Dec-2025
Cross Examination
Judge, 2nd Labour Court, Aurangabad.
-
13-Nov-2025
Cross Examination
Judge, 2nd Labour Court, Aurangabad.
-
28-Oct-2025
Cross Examination
Judge, 2nd Labour Court, Aurangabad.
-
22-Sep-2025
Cross Examination
Judge, 2nd Labour Court, Aurangabad.
-
28-Aug-2025
Cross Examination
Judge, 2nd Labour Court, Aurangabad.
-
07-Aug-2025
Cross Examination
Judge, 2nd Labour Court, Aurangabad.
-
14-Jul-2025
Cross Examination
Judge, 2nd Labour Court, Aurangabad.
-
19-Jun-2025
Cross Examination
Judge, 2nd Labour Court, Aurangabad.
-
03-Jun-2025
Cross Examination
Judge, 2nd Labour Court, Aurangabad.
-
14-May-2025
Respondents Evidence
Judge, 2nd Labour Court, Aurangabad.
-
16-Apr-2025
Respondents Evidence
Judge, 2nd Labour Court, Aurangabad.
-
24-Mar-2025
Respondents Evidence
Judge, 2nd Labour Court, Aurangabad.
-
04-Mar-2025
Respondents Evidence
Judge, 2nd Labour Court, Aurangabad.
-
13-Feb-2025
Respondents Evidence
Judge, 2nd Labour Court, Aurangabad.
-
16-Jan-2025
Respondents Evidence
Judge, 2nd Labour Court, Aurangabad.
-
27-Dec-2024
Evidence
Judge, 2nd Labour Court, Aurangabad.
-
30-Nov-2024
Evidence
Judge, 2nd Labour Court, Aurangabad.
-
13-Nov-2024
Cross Examination
Judge, 2nd Labour Court, Aurangabad.
-
14-Oct-2024
Cross Examination
Judge, 2nd Labour Court, Aurangabad.
-
26-Sep-2024
Cross Examination
Judge, 2nd Labour Court, Aurangabad.
-
26-Aug-2024
Evidence
Judge, 2nd Labour Court, Aurangabad.
-
15-Jul-2024
Issues
Judge, 2nd Labour Court, Aurangabad.
-
28-May-2024
Issues
Judge, 2nd Labour Court, Aurangabad.
-
16-Apr-2024
Issues
Judge, 2nd Labour Court, Aurangabad.
-
03-Apr-2024
Issues
Judge, 2nd Labour Court, Aurangabad.
-
23-Feb-2024
Issues
Judge, 2nd Labour Court, Aurangabad.
-
23-Jan-2024
Issues
Judge, 2nd Labour Court, Aurangabad.
-
28-Dec-2023
Issues
Judge, 2nd Labour Court, Aurangabad.
-
30-Nov-2023
Copy of Order Below ExhibitView PDF
-
30-Nov-2023
Issues
Judge, 2nd Labour Court, Aurangabad.
-
09-Nov-2023
Written Statement
Judge, 2nd Labour Court, Aurangabad.
-
26-Oct-2023
Written Statement
Judge, 2nd Labour Court, Aurangabad.
-
11-Sep-2023
Written Statement
Judge, 2nd Labour Court, Aurangabad.
-
09-Aug-2023
Written Statement
Judge, 2nd Labour Court, Aurangabad.
-
06-Jul-2023
Written Statement
Judge, 2nd Labour Court, Aurangabad.
-
15-Jun-2023
Written Statement
Judge, 2nd Labour Court, Aurangabad.
-
12-May-2023
Notice
Judge, 2nd Labour Court, Aurangabad.
-
03-Apr-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
20-Mar-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 15/2023
Summary In Application PGA 15 of 2023, the Labor Court at Aurangabad rejected the appellant's petition challenging their employment termination. The court found that the appellant failed to produce documentary evidence of authorization to represent the company and determined that the company had no obligation to provide witness statements in support of the appellant's claims. The petition was dismissed as incomplete. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts