Bajaj Auto Ltd. vs Vivek Tulshiram Wagh Advocate - DHOBALE NITIN LALASAHEB — 1800140/2008
Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 10-1and12-5. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT on 09th March 2026.
Ref-IDA - Reference
CNR: MHLC200000442008
Filing Number
1800140/2008
Filing Date
05-07-2008
Registration No
1800140/2008
Registration Date
22-07-2008
Court
Labour Court, Aurangabad
Judge
1-JUDGE, 1st LABOUR COURT, AURANGABAD.
Decision Date
09th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Bajaj Auto Ltd.
Adv. DANKH SACHIN VASANTRAO
Respondent(s)
Vivek Tulshiram Wagh Advocate - DHOBALE NITIN LALASAHEB
Hearing History
Judge: 1-JUDGE, 1st LABOUR COURT, AURANGABAD.
Disposed
Judgment
Judgment
Citation
Argument
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 06-03-2026 | Judgment |
| 23-02-2026 | Judgment |
| 13-02-2026 | Citation |
| 10-02-2026 | Argument |
Interim Orders
Summary The Labor Court (IDA 140 of 2008) dismissed the appellant's claim regarding manpower requirements for vehicle production at an Aurangabad factory during 1990-1998. The court found that the appellant failed to substantiate the exact number of permanent and temporary workers needed across different production periods, and rejected arguments about insufficient organizational documentation. The court upheld the employer's position that manpower decisions were based on actual production targets and operational requirements, not merely on formal calculations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Labor Court (IDA 140 of 2008) dismissed the appellant's claim regarding manpower requirements for vehicle production at an Aurangabad factory during 1990-1998. The court found that the appellant failed to substantiate the exact number of permanent and temporary workers needed across different production periods, and rejected arguments about insufficient organizational documentation. The court upheld the employer's position that manpower decisions were based on actual production targets and operational requirements, not merely on formal calculations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts