Rupnna Chandrakant Kure and Anr. vs Agriculture Produce Market Committee Akkalkot Advocate - Aiwale M.B. — 5/2025

Case under Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 Section 28. Status: Cross Examination. Next hearing: 17th April 2026.

Complaint ULP1

CNR: MHLC130000232025

Cross Examination

Next Hearing

17th April 2026

Filing Number

26/2025

Filing Date

17-02-2025

Registration No

5/2025

Registration Date

17-02-2025

Court

Labour Court, Solapur

Judge

1-Judge Labour Court

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union And Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 Section 28

Petitioner(s)

Rupnna Chandrakant Kure and Anr.

Adv. Deshpande V.R.

Pradip Tippna Mense

Adv. Deshpande V.R.

Vishvnath Dattatraya Kande

Malikarjun Nagappa Jeurgi

Vishal Basavraj Nibal

Adv. Deshpande V.R.

Respondent(s)

Agriculture Produce Market Committee Akkalkot Advocate - Aiwale M.B.

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Judge Labour Court

13-03-2026

Cross Examination

06-03-2026

Cross Examination

23-02-2026

Cross Examination

28-01-2026

Cross Examination

19-01-2026

Cross Examination

Interim Orders

29-10-2025
Order below Exh---

Summary: The Labour Court, Solapur partly allowed the interim relief application filed by five employees of the Agriculture Market Produce Committee, Akkalkot, who sought protection against alleged unfair labour practices and threatened termination. The court found that the complainants had established a prima-facie case of unfair labour practices and that the balance of convenience favoured them, ordering the respondent not to terminate their services without following due process of law pending final disposal of the main complaint. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Labour Court, Solapur partly allowed the interim relief application filed by five employees of the Agriculture Market Produce Committee, Akkalkot, who sought protection against alleged unfair labour practices and threatened termination. The court found that the complainants had established a prima-facie case of unfair labour practices and that the balance of convenience favoured them, ordering the respondent not to terminate their services without following due process of law pending final disposal of the main complaint. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Labour Court, Solapur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case