Rupnna Chandrakant Kure and Anr. vs Agriculture Produce Market Committee Akkalkot Advocate - Aiwale M.B. — 5/2025
Case under Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 Section 28. Status: Cross Examination. Next hearing: 17th April 2026.
Complaint ULP1
CNR: MHLC130000232025
Next Hearing
17th April 2026
Filing Number
26/2025
Filing Date
17-02-2025
Registration No
5/2025
Registration Date
17-02-2025
Court
Labour Court, Solapur
Judge
1-Judge Labour Court
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Rupnna Chandrakant Kure and Anr.
Adv. Deshpande V.R.
Pradip Tippna Mense
Adv. Deshpande V.R.
Vishvnath Dattatraya Kande
Malikarjun Nagappa Jeurgi
Vishal Basavraj Nibal
Adv. Deshpande V.R.
Respondent(s)
Agriculture Produce Market Committee Akkalkot Advocate - Aiwale M.B.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Judge Labour Court
Cross Examination
Cross Examination
Cross Examination
Cross Examination
Cross Examination
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Cross Examination |
| 06-03-2026 | Cross Examination |
| 23-02-2026 | Cross Examination |
| 28-01-2026 | Cross Examination |
| 19-01-2026 | Cross Examination |
Interim Orders
Summary: The Labour Court, Solapur partly allowed the interim relief application filed by five employees of the Agriculture Market Produce Committee, Akkalkot, who sought protection against alleged unfair labour practices and threatened termination. The court found that the complainants had established a prima-facie case of unfair labour practices and that the balance of convenience favoured them, ordering the respondent not to terminate their services without following due process of law pending final disposal of the main complaint. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Labour Court, Solapur partly allowed the interim relief application filed by five employees of the Agriculture Market Produce Committee, Akkalkot, who sought protection against alleged unfair labour practices and threatened termination. The court found that the complainants had established a prima-facie case of unfair labour practices and that the balance of convenience favoured them, ordering the respondent not to terminate their services without following due process of law pending final disposal of the main complaint. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts