Pawan Rajkumar Swami vs M/s. Suresh Indu Lasers Pvt Ltd Advocate - A.D. Patwardhan — 266/2023
Case under Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 Section 2a. Status: Evidence of Second Party. Next hearing: 09th April 2026.
Reference IDA - Reference
CNR: MHLC120006822023
Next Hearing
09th April 2026
Filing Number
682/2023
Filing Date
30-11-2023
Registration No
266/2023
Registration Date
13-12-2023
Court
Labour Court, Pune.
Judge
1-Judge, 1st Labour Court, Pune.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Pawan Rajkumar Swami
Adv. D. B. Sharmale
Respondent(s)
M/s. Suresh Indu Lasers Pvt Ltd Advocate - A.D. Patwardhan
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Judge, 1st Labour Court, Pune.
Evidence of Second Party
Cross of First Party
Evidence of Opponent
Evidence of Opponent
Evidence of Opponent
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Evidence of Second Party |
| 10-02-2026 | Cross of First Party |
| 15-01-2026 | Evidence of Opponent |
| 26-11-2025 | Evidence of Opponent |
| 10-10-2025 | Evidence of Opponent |
Interim Orders
Summary This is a witness examination transcript, not a final court order. The First Labour Court, Pune (Ref. IDA No. 266/2023) recorded the cross-examination of Kiran Hiraman Gaikwad, the respondent company's witness, on 06/03/2026. The witness testified regarding charge sheets issued to an applicant/worker, closure of the Handewadi unit, and various factory documentation, with significant contradictions and gaps in evidence acknowledged during cross-examination. No judgment or final order has been pronounced; the case remains pending with cross-examination completed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary This is a witness examination transcript, not a final court order. The First Labour Court, Pune (Ref. IDA No. 266/2023) recorded the cross-examination of Kiran Hiraman Gaikwad, the respondent company's witness, on 06/03/2026. The witness testified regarding charge sheets issued to an applicant/worker, closure of the Handewadi unit, and various factory documentation, with significant contradictions and gaps in evidence acknowledged during cross-examination. No judgment or final order has been pronounced; the case remains pending with cross-examination completed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts