Pawan Rajkumar Swami vs M/s. Suresh Indu Lasers Pvt Ltd Advocate - A.D. Patwardhan — 266/2023

Case under Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 Section 2a. Status: Evidence of Second Party. Next hearing: 09th April 2026.

Reference IDA - Reference

CNR: MHLC120006822023

Evidence of Second Party

Next Hearing

09th April 2026

Filing Number

682/2023

Filing Date

30-11-2023

Registration No

266/2023

Registration Date

13-12-2023

Court

Labour Court, Pune.

Judge

1-Judge, 1st Labour Court, Pune.

Acts & Sections

Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 Section 2a

Petitioner(s)

Pawan Rajkumar Swami

Adv. D. B. Sharmale

Respondent(s)

M/s. Suresh Indu Lasers Pvt Ltd Advocate - A.D. Patwardhan

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Judge, 1st Labour Court, Pune.

06-03-2026

Evidence of Second Party

10-02-2026

Cross of First Party

15-01-2026

Evidence of Opponent

26-11-2025

Evidence of Opponent

10-10-2025

Evidence of Opponent

Interim Orders

10-10-2025
P. P. Order
06-03-2026
Copy of Evidence

Summary This is a witness examination transcript, not a final court order. The First Labour Court, Pune (Ref. IDA No. 266/2023) recorded the cross-examination of Kiran Hiraman Gaikwad, the respondent company's witness, on 06/03/2026. The witness testified regarding charge sheets issued to an applicant/worker, closure of the Handewadi unit, and various factory documentation, with significant contradictions and gaps in evidence acknowledged during cross-examination. No judgment or final order has been pronounced; the case remains pending with cross-examination completed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary This is a witness examination transcript, not a final court order. The First Labour Court, Pune (Ref. IDA No. 266/2023) recorded the cross-examination of Kiran Hiraman Gaikwad, the respondent company's witness, on 06/03/2026. The witness testified regarding charge sheets issued to an applicant/worker, closure of the Handewadi unit, and various factory documentation, with significant contradictions and gaps in evidence acknowledged during cross-examination. No judgment or final order has been pronounced; the case remains pending with cross-examination completed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Labour Court, Pune. All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case