Mahesh Suresh Jadhav vs M/s. Suresh Indu Lasers Pvt Ltd Advocate - A.D. patwardhan — 260/2023
Case under Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 Section 2. Status: Evidence of Second Party. Next hearing: 09th April 2026.
Reference IDA - Reference
CNR: MHLC120006772023
Next Hearing
09th April 2026
Filing Number
677/2023
Filing Date
30-11-2023
Registration No
260/2023
Registration Date
07-12-2023
Court
Labour Court, Pune.
Judge
1-Judge, 1st Labour Court, Pune.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Mahesh Suresh Jadhav
Adv. D. B. Sharmale
Respondent(s)
M/s. Suresh Indu Lasers Pvt Ltd Advocate - A.D. patwardhan
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Judge, 1st Labour Court, Pune.
Evidence of Second Party
Cross of First Party
Evidence of Opponent
Evidence of Opponent
Evidence of Opponent
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Evidence of Second Party |
| 10-02-2026 | Cross of First Party |
| 15-01-2026 | Evidence of Opponent |
| 26-11-2025 | Evidence of Opponent |
| 10-10-2025 | Evidence of Opponent |
Interim Orders
This is a transcript of witness examination and cross-examination proceedings in a labour dispute case before the Second Labour Court, Pune (Ref. IDA No. 260/2023). The document records the chief examination of witness Kiran Hiraman Gaikwad (respondent's witness) and his cross-examination by the applicant's advocate, covering allegations against workers including charge sheets, factory license issues, and claims of reduced production. The cross-examination was completed on 06/03/2026, with the court noting significant gaps in documentary evidence such as missing gate entry records, production reports, and incomplete details about alleged misconduct by the applicant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This is a transcript of witness examination and cross-examination proceedings in a labour dispute case before the Second Labour Court, Pune (Ref. IDA No. 260/2023). The document records the chief examination of witness Kiran Hiraman Gaikwad (respondent's witness) and his cross-examination by the applicant's advocate, covering allegations against workers including charge sheets, factory license issues, and claims of reduced production. The cross-examination was completed on 06/03/2026, with the court noting significant gaps in documentary evidence such as missing gate entry records, production reports, and incomplete details about alleged misconduct by the applicant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts