Govind Vilas Bhoge vs M/s. Suresh Indu Lasers Pvt Ltd Advocate - A.D. patwardhan — 259/2023
Case under Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 Section 2. Status: Evidence of Second Party. Next hearing: 09th April 2026.
Reference IDA - Reference
CNR: MHLC120006762023
Next Hearing
09th April 2026
Filing Number
676/2023
Filing Date
30-11-2023
Registration No
259/2023
Registration Date
07-12-2023
Court
Labour Court, Pune.
Judge
1-Judge, 1st Labour Court, Pune.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Govind Vilas Bhoge
Adv. D. B. Sharmale
Respondent(s)
M/s. Suresh Indu Lasers Pvt Ltd Advocate - A.D. patwardhan
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Judge, 1st Labour Court, Pune.
Evidence of Second Party
Cross of First Party
Evidence of Opponent
Evidence of Opponent
Evidence of Opponent
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Evidence of Second Party |
| 10-02-2026 | Cross of First Party |
| 15-01-2026 | Evidence of Opponent |
| 26-11-2025 | Evidence of Opponent |
| 10-10-2025 | Evidence of Opponent |
Interim Orders
Summary This is a labor court proceeding (Case No. IDA 259/2023) before the First Labour Court, Pune, involving examination and cross-examination of a respondent's witness (Shri. Dilip Kumar Solanki) regarding alleged misconduct charges against workers, including union formation and claims of work slowdown. The cross-examination challenged the credibility of the witness testimony regarding specific incidents, missing documentation, vague charges, and the closure of the Handewadi manufacturing unit, with the document recording the completion of cross-examination as of March 6, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary This is a labor court proceeding (Case No. IDA 259/2023) before the First Labour Court, Pune, involving examination and cross-examination of a respondent's witness (Shri. Dilip Kumar Solanki) regarding alleged misconduct charges against workers, including union formation and claims of work slowdown. The cross-examination challenged the credibility of the witness testimony regarding specific incidents, missing documentation, vague charges, and the closure of the Handewadi manufacturing unit, with the document recording the completion of cross-examination as of March 6, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts